Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 23;19(4):429–437. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.429

Table 1. Mammographic features of 43 suspicious microcalcifications.

Mammographic feature Pathology p-value
Benign (n = 18) No. (%) Malignant (n = 25) No. (%)
Breast densities 0.407
 a, b 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7)
 c, d 13 (46.4) 15 (53.6)
Lesion extent (cm)* 1.3 (0.5–6.6) 2.0 (0.6–10.9) 0.232
Shape <0.001
 Punctate/round 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0)
 Amorphous 11 (68.7) 5 (31.3)
 Coarse heterogeneous 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
 Fine pleomorphic, linear, linear-branching 1 (5.3) 18 (94.7)
Distribution 0.234
 Regional 4 (40.0) 6 (60.0)
 Clustered 12 (52.2) 11 (47.8)
 Linear 0 0
 Segmental 2 (20.0) 8 (80.0)
Associated findings < 0.001
 None 16 (66.7) 8 (33.3)
 Mass 2 (11.1) 16 (88.9)
 Architectural distortion 0 1 (100.0)
BI-RADS categories <0.001
 4a 14 (87.5) 2 (12.5)
 4b 4 (33.3) 8 (66.7)
 4c 0 8 (100.0)
 5 0 7 (100.0)

BI-RADS=Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

*Median (range).