Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 23;19(4):429–437. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.429

Table 4. Factors affecting the detectability of HHUS for mammographically suspicious microcalcifications.

Pathologic and mammographic finding HHUS OR (95% CI) p-value
Not detected (n=12)
No. (%)
Detected (n=31)
No. (%)
Pathology 0.001
Benign 11 (61.6) 7 (38.9) 1.000
Malignant 1 (40.0) 24 (96.0) 37.714 (4.123–344.993)
Extent (cm) 0.017
 ≤1 7 (53.8) 6 (46.2) 1.000
 > 1 5 (16.7) 25 (83.3) 5.833 (1.364–24.941)
Shape 0.014
 Punctate/round, amorphous, coarse heterogeneous 11 (45.8) 13 (54.2) 1.000
 Fine pleomorphic, linear, linear branching 1 (5.3) 18 (94.7) 15.228 (1.743–133.065)
Distribution 0.528
 Regional, clustered 10 (30.3) 23 (69.7) 1.000
 Linear, segmental 2 (20.0) 8 (80.0) 1.739 (0.312–9.694)
Associated findings 0.016
 None 12 (50.0) 12 (50.0) 1.000
 Mass, architectural distortion 0 19 (100.0) 39.020 (1.963–775.810)
BI-RADS categories 0.046
 4a, 4b 11 (39.3) 17 (60.7) 1.000
 4c, 5 1 (6.7) 14 (93.3) 9.059 (1.039–79.010)
Breast densities 0.894
 a, b 4 (26.7) 11 (73.3) 1.000
 c, d 8 (28.6) 20 (71.4) 0.909 (0.222–3.715)

HHUS=handheld breast ultrasound; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; BI-RADS=Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.