Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2016 Dec 19;39(6):638–652. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.10.023

Table 1. Tumor incidence, survival, and spectrum in p53+/− mice with secondary CIN-inducing mutations.

Tumor incidence is shown as percentage of cohort with tumor in double mutants versus p53+/− mice, respectively. Median tumor free survival is shown as the median survival of the double mutant cohort versus the p53+/− cohort, respectively. Studies in which effect on tumor phenotype is listed as unchanged are those in which incidence and/or survival between p53+/− and doubly mutant mice did not reach statistical significance.

Secondary Mutation Tumor Incidence Median Tumor Free Survival (days) Primary Tumor Type$ Effect on Tumor Phenotype Reference
Bub1+/H ^ 57% vs 43% 495 vs 471* sarcoma Unchanged (Baker et al., 2009)
Bub1+/− 57% vs 43% 469 vs 471* sarcoma Unchanged
Bub1H/H 78% vs 43% 346 vs 471* lymphoma Exacerbated
Bub1−/H 76% vs 43% 202 vs 471* lymphoma Exacerbated
Bub3+/− 47% vs 62% ~560 vs ~525 osteosarcoma Unchanged (Kalitsis et al., 2005)
Mad1+/− 76% vs 67% osteosarcoma Unchanged (Chi et al., 2009)
Mad2+/− 88% vs 67% lymphoma Exacerbated
Mad1+/−;Mad2+/− 95% vs 67% osteosarcoma Exacerbated
Mad1+/−;Mad2+/− 25% vs 53% in Mad2+/−;p53+/− # osteosarcoma Suppressed
Separase OE MMTV-LTR promoter (mammary) 100% 439 vs ~580 mammary carcinoma Exacerbated (Mukherjee et al., 2014)
Separase+/H 100% vs ~50% 460 vs ~530 Exacerbated (Mukherjee et al., 2011)
Mps1f/f p53f/+; Lck-Cre (T cells)& 100% vs ~0% in p53f/+;Lck-Cre ~105 vs >360 T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma Exacerbated (Foijer et al., 2014)
Plk4 OE;p53f/+; ERT-CRE (β-actin promoter) ~565 vs ~575 lymphoma Unchanged (Vitre et al., 2015)
$

the primary tumor type in p53+/− animals is sarcoma

^

H indicates a hypomorphic allele

*

average tumor latency

#

lymphoma incidence

&

f indicates a floxed allele