Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 5;66(1):134–144. doi: 10.2337/db16-0394

Table 1.

Subject characteristics

GPA control subjects (n = 11) MMTT control subjects (n = 10) PS-CF (n = 9) PI-CF (n = 11) Overall P value
Control subjects vs. PI-CF Control subjects vs. PS-CF PI-CF vs. PS-CF
Demographics
 Sex (female) 5 (45) 5 (50) 6 (67) 5 (45) 0.80
 Age (years) 25 (21–38) 25 (20–41) 31 (16–56) 19 (16–50) 0.13
 BMI (kg/m2) 24 (21–29) 24 (18–27) 24 (19–33) 22 (17–31) 0.64
 HbA1c (%)# N/D 5.0 (4.7–5.5) 5.2 (3.8–6.0) 5.5 (5.3–6.2) 0.004
0.0006* 0.34* 0.06*
OGTT profile
 Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 82 (74–107) 85 (68–94) 87 (74–102) 92 (73–98) 0.18
 1-h glucose (mg/dL) 122 (70–199) 114 (60–157) 118 (67–165) 162 (127–193) 0.01
0.001&* 0.35* 0.009*
 2-h glucose (mg/dL) 95 (60–128) 94 (74–111) 104 (46–115) 97 (66–134) 0.90

Data are medians and ranges (min–max) for continuous variables and number and (percentage) for categorical variables.

*Between-group comparisons performed when overall P value was significant at P ≤ 0.05;

#to convert to mmol/mol, multiply by 10.93 and subtract 23.50;

&significant differences between PI-CF and MMTT control subjects.