Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Dec 20;41(1):187–196. doi: 10.1111/acer.13275

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Differential sensitivity to ethanol and photic input in adolescent versus adult mice. (A) Adolescent mice (n = 10–11/tx) had larger phase-delays to light input at ZT14 than did adults (n = 12–13/tx) regardless of treatment and were unimpaired by acute ethanol (EtOH; 1.5 g/kg) compared to age-matched, saline-treated controls. Adult mice receiving ethanol showed the expected attenuation in photic phase-delays compared to saline-treated adult controls. (B) Neither ethanol (n = 8–10/age group) nor saline (n = 10/age group) had a phase-delaying effect at ZT14 in the absence of a light pulse. Data are mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05.