Skip to main content
. 2016 May 22;30(1):8–19. doi: 10.5713/ajas.16.0170

Table 4.

Position, SNP alleles, estimated effects of SNPs for weaning weight (kg) that were detected at 5% chromosome-wise level

SNP1) Chr Position (bp)2) Allele3) MAF Estimates of SNPs effects4) Significance (−log10P5)) Nearest gene6)


Additive Dominance Name Distance (bp)
BTB-01747944 1 4,070,974 T/G G(0.19) 12.1±2.91 −15.2±3.33 4.68 LOC785105 40,376
BTB-02105769 1 4,149,602 T/C C(0.26) 8.74±2.29 −12.3±2.67 4.73 LOC785105 119,004
ARS-BFGL-NGS-35164 3 55,278,469 G/A G(0.46) - 8.86±2.02 4.78 CDC7 14,260
ARS-BFGL-NGS-5482 4 61,908,479 G/A G(0.26) −7.65±1.74 - 4.79 THAP5 17,976
BTA-29483-no-rs 5 4,963,140 C/A C(0.17) −8.92±2.04 - 5.02 CAPS2 85,827
Hapmap52787-rs29024515 5 33,277,668 T/C C(0.21) 11.6±2.36 −8.63±2.9 4.8 LOC505861 within
BTA-73718-no-rs 5 66,075,729 T/G G(0.07) −12.0±3.01 - 4.06 NEDD1 249,756
ARS-BFGL-NGS-73495 5 90,096,456 G/A G(0.31) −6.46±1.64 - 4.01 SSPN 53,061
ARS-BFGL-NGS-34063 5 125,275,403 G/A G(0.35) - −9.06±2.03 5 FAM19A5 324,968
BTB-00317489 7 64,536,896 G/A G(0.27) −8.10±1.71 - 5.45 GRIA1 40,884
ARS-BFGL-BAC-11115 11 82,938,260 T/C T(0.28) −6.87±1.60 - 4.92 MSGN1 11,224
ARS-BFGL-NGS-103169 12 39,576,130 T/C T(0.14) −18.6±4.29 −21.0±4.71 4.05 PCDH9 313,077
Hapmap26937-BTA-127685 12 54,656,928 G/A G(0.34) 6.49±1.56 - 4.64 RBM26 194,009
BTB-00497582 12 54,690,096 T/G T(0.37) 6.31±1.51 - 4.65 RBM26 160,841
Hapmap57428-rs29016058 12 78,783,490 T/C C(0.11) −21.9±4.99 22.7±5.44 3.81 LOC787750 583,453
ARS-BFGL-NGS-39382 16 47,648,555 G/A A(0.30) 8.45±1.83 −5.86±2.38 4.63 PLCH2 within
ARS-BFGL-BAC-33668 20 42,739,808 T/G G(0.16) 3.58±1.56 6.93±2.05 4.4 ADAMTS12 within
Hapmap40017-BTA-65421 29 33,632,380 T/C T(0.05) −14.2±3.53 - 4.27 ETS1 86,263

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MAF, minor allele frequency; QTL, quantitative trait loci.

1),2)

SNP marker annotations and their positions were based on the bovine reference genome (btau4.0).

3)

Nucleotides of substitution.

4)

Estimates of additive and dominance effects with standard errors.

5)

Negative logarithm of the comparison-wise p-value of the test-statistic against the null hypothesis of no QTL at the most likely position for the inferred QTL model.

6)

The nearest known gene to the significant SNP.