Skip to main content
. 2016 May 22;30(1):8–19. doi: 10.5713/ajas.16.0170

Table 8.

Position, SNP alleles, estimated effects of SNPs for longissimus dorsi muscle area (cm2) that were detected at 5% chromosome-wise level

SNP1) Chr Position (bp)2) Allele3) MAF Estimates of SNPs effects4) Significance (−log10P5)) Nearest gene6)


Additive Dominance Name Distance (bp)
ARS-BFGL-NGS-96411 1 99,002,229 G/A A(0.08) 15.8±3.06 15.9±3.20 5.68* LOC100140324 3,400
ARS-BFGL-NGS-36803 2 63,623,562 G/A A(0.07) 26.4±4.29 27.3±4.40 8.13* LOC100140701 330,224
BTA-99819-no-rs 3 84,880,188 T/C T(0.07) −9.60±2.23 11.3±2.42 4.69 PDE4B within
Hapmap43716-BTA-87799 4 25,686,934 G/A A(0.16) 8.32±1.78 9.79±1.92 5.54* LOC100139029 144,805
ARS-BFGL-NGS-11156 6 31,210,287 T/C C(0.06) 15.5±3.07 16.8±3.22 5.84* UNC5C within
BTB-01321253 7 83,625,072 G/A G(0.17) - 3.88±0.90 4.72 XRCC4 321,087
BFGL-NGS-110568 8 56,596,924 G/A G(0.06) −26.6±4.29 26.4±4.40 8.01* CEP78 14,027
ARS-BFGL-NGS-77091 15 76,834,507 T/C C(0.22) - 3.49±0.84 4.47 AMBRA1 within
ARS-BFGL-NGS-25982 20 4,493,745 G/A A(0.40) 2.49±0.64 - 4.00 NEURL1B 9,980
Hapmap53674-rs29025319 20 8,676,696 T/C C(0.12) 4.69±0.96 - 5.84 LOC783819 132,888
ARS-BFGL-NGS-38482 20 37,708,167 T/C C(0.10) 7.25±1.69 6.50±1.90 3.95 RICTOR within
BFGL-NGS-112221 20 75,476,187 T/C T(0.27) −2.80±0.70 - 4.21 ZDHHC11 15,990
BFGL-NGS-113227 20 75,530,515 T/C T(0.24) −2.82±0.72 - 4.02 CEP72 within
BTB-01392802 21 54,287,321 G/A G(0.11) −16.5±3.21 14.8±3.28 5.95* LOC787825 125,238
ARS-BFGL-NGS-35298 24 13,445,705 T/C T(0.27) −2.57±0.66 - 3.94 LOC781724 3,783
BTA-100770-no-rs 24 40,446,177 T/C C(0.46) −2.45±0.60 - 4.25 EPB41L3 within
ARS-BFGL-NGS-16328 26 18,231,319 G/A A(0.13) −3.94±0.91 - 4.78 TLL2 within
ARS-BFGL-NGS-94161 28 35,084,332 G/A G(0.14) −10.8±2.17 11.0±2.27 5.38* SFTPD 3,977

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MAF, minor allele frequency; QTL, quantitative trait loci.

1),2)

SNP marker annotations and their positions were based on the bovine reference genome (btau4.0).

3)

Nucleotides of substitution.

4)

Estimates of additive and dominance effects with standard errors.

5)

Negative logarithm of the comparison-wise p-value of the test-statistic against the null hypothesis of no QTL at the most likely position for the inferred QTL model.

6)

The nearest known gene to the significant SNP.

*

Significant at the 5% genome-wise level.