Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 19;372(1714):20160108. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0108

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Dynamics in the visual representation of scene size. (a) The stimulus set consisted of 48 images, differing in four experimental factors (scene size, clutter level, contrast and luminance). (b) Results of single scenes classification from MEG data (50% chance level). Horizontal grey line indicates chance-level decoding. Vertical dotted line indicates stimulus onset. (c) Results of scene size classification (0% chance level). (d) Results of cross-classification of scene size across other experimental factors (50% chance level). (e) Results of cross-classification of scene size across time. (f) Comparison of representations in computational models to MEG data using RSA. (g) Scene size representations in computational models. (h) Representations of luminance and contrast in the DNNs. Stars in (g,h) indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05; FDR corrected for multiple comparisons. Figure adapted from [32].