Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;13(1):201–209. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.64045

Table II.

Characteristics of evaluation system

Time frame – July 1, 2013 to March 1, 2013 All evaluations Milestone- based Non-milestone-based
Total evaluation tools employed 31 29 2
Total evaluations for class 710 513 197
Total faculty evaluations for class 228 180 48
Percent of requested faculty evaluations completed 228/288 (79%)
Directly observed faculty evaluations for class 80 80 0
Supervising peer evaluations (PGY-2 or PGY-3) 31 31 0
Same training level peer evaluations (PGY 1) 135 0 135
Nursing evaluations for class 48 48 0
Self-assessments for class 87 87 0
Patient satisfaction 20 20 0
Commendations or concerns 6 0 6
Clinical Competency Committee Evaluations 13 13 0
Synthetic Evals – Program Director Formative; Clinic Director ready for distance supervision 26 26 0
Documentation reviews (Progress Notes/ H&P, DC Summary) 66 66 0
Avg. No. of milestones used to rate each resident in PGY-1 year 64
Individual milestone-based ratings for class (excludes self-assessments and chart reviews) 7608
Avg. no. of milestone-based ratings per resident 585