Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;13(1):228–235. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.64721

Table II.

Immunohistochemical expression of Ob-R, ER and PR in the six histological types of endometrial tissues

N Histological diagnosis Histopathologicala Digital score (median ± SD)b
Ob-R ER PR Ob-R* ER** PR***
10 Proliferative endometrium (PE) (++) (+++) (++) 26 ±9 30 ±13 113 ±45
20 Secretory endometrium (SE) (+) (++) (–) 143 ±29 153 ±56 208 ±44
25 Non-atypical hyperplasia (NAH) (++) (+++) (++) 87 ±35 33 ±21 162 ±67
19 Atypical hyperplasia (AH) (++) (+++) (+) 98 ±34 42 ±22 161 ±59
23 Endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) (++) (++) (+) 141 ±64 132 ±81 205 ±47
11 Non-endometrioid carcinoma (NEC) (+) (+) (–) 177 ±68 214 ±37 224 ±41
Kruskal-Wallis test p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
a

Histopathological score is shown as average per group;

b

Digital score is shown as the optical median value of groups ± SD. SNK test:

*

PE ≠ SE ≠ NAH =AH ≠ EEC = NEC;

**

PE ≠ SE ≠ NAH = AH ≠ EEC ≠ NEC;

***

PE ≠ SE ≠ NAH = AH ≠ EEC = NEC. Spearman correlation: Ob-R vs. ER (r = 1, p < 0.0001), Ob-R vs. PR (r = 0.943, p < 0.005). Ob-R – leptin receptor, ER – estrogen receptor, PR – progesterone receptor.