Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 6;7(1):20160078. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0078

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Aerodynamic effect of serrations. (a) The two different types of artificial serrations used. (b) Flow field measured at 0.9 spanwise position, an angle of attack of 3° and a Reynolds number of 60 000. The inset shows the velocity scale (u/u, u = freestream velocity) ranging from 0 (blue) to 1 (red). The open arrows point to the upper wing surface. The filled arrowhead points to a reflection close to the leading edge that prevented recording of data. (c) Maximum Reynolds shear stress (mRss) as a function of chord length for the different wing configurations. (d) The lift-to-drag ratio as a function of the angle of attack for the different wing configurations. CL and CD are the lift and drag coefficients, respectively. Red, metal; black, silicon; blue, clean wing. The relative wing height is the quotient of height z divided by chord length c in per cent. Data in (b), (c) and (d) were redrawn after figs 4, 6a and 11d in Winzen et al. [49], respectively.