Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 1;22(6):575–584. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0431

Table 7.

Clinico-Pathologic Features According to BRAFV600E Status in 36 Patients Whose Primary Tumor was Genotyped

  BRAF positive BRAF negative pa
Age
 <45 7 (25%) 5 (62.5%) 0.086
 >45 21 (75%) 3 (37.5%)  
Gender
 Male 11 (39%) 1 (12.5%) 0.2
 Female 17 (61%) 7 (87.5%)  
Primary tumor size
 ≤1.5 cm 12 (43%) 4 (50%) 1
 >1.5 cm 16 (57%) 4 (50%)  
PTC subtypes
 Tall cell (n=14) 14 (50%) 0 0.01b
 Classical (n=19) 13 (46%) 6 (75%)  
 Infiltrative FVPTC (n=2) 0 2 (25%)  
 Microcarcinoma, infiltrative (n=1) 1 (4%) 0  
No. of positive nodes
 ≤3 10 (36%) 1 (12.5%) 0.388
 >3 18 (64%) 7 (87.5%)  
Extra-nodal extension (n=34)c
 Yes 10 (37%) 2 (40%) 1
 No 17 (63%) 5 (60%)  
Size of largest positive node (n=35)d
 ≤1 cm 14 (51%) 1 (14%) 0.1
 >1 cm 13 (49%) 7 (86%)  
Size of largest metastatic focus (n=35)d
 ≤1 cm 15 (56%) 2 (25%) 0.2
 >1 cm 12 (44%) 6 (75%)  
Vascular invasion
 Present 0 1 (12.5%) 0.22
 Absent 28 (100%) 7 (87.5%)  
ETE
 Extensive 18 (64%) 4 (50%) 0.6
 Focal 2 (7%) 3 (37.5%)  
 None 8 (29%) 1 (12.5%)  
a

Fisher's exact test.

b

Tall cell vs. nontall cell.

c

In 2 cases, extra nodal extension could not be evaluated.

d

In one individual, the size of the metastatic node and largest metastatic focus could not be assessed.