Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2016 Feb 18;47:64–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.013

Table 5c.

Provider practice style conditional on hospital, year and patient gender, age, comorbidities, and previous AMI.

(1) Low (2) High (3) Low (4) High
Beta < 1 Beta < 1 Beta = 1 Beta = 1
Z-Patient Appropriateness Index −0.0074* (0.0032) 0.0016 (0.0030) 0.0083* (0.0033) −0.0018 (0.0033)
Hospital*Year FE Y Y Y Y
Patient Age Categories & Gender Y Y Y Y
Previous AMI Y Y Y Y
Patient comorbidities Y Y Y Y
Physician characteristics Y Y Y Y
N 217,323 223,853 217,323 223,853
R 2 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
Alpha < 0 Alpha < 0 Alpha > 0 Alpha > 0
Z-patient appropriateness index −0.0031 (0.0035) −0.0051 (0.0034) 0.0025 (0.0035) −0.0004 (0.0044)
Hospital*Year FE Y Y Y Y
Patient age categories & gender Y Y Y Y
Previous AMI Y Y Y Y
Patient comorbidities Y Y Y Y
Physician characteristics Y Y Y Y
N 217,323 223,853 217,323 223,853
R 2 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00

Notes: A one-standard deviation increase in the patient appropriateness index means that low-propensity patients are 0.74 pp (5.4% = 0.74/13.8) less likely to have a low-beta cardiologist. Standard errors clustered at the provider level and appear in parentheses.

*

indicates p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001.