Table 2.
Select recent references, in chronological order, on adipose tissue segmentation and quantification in animal studies
| References | Remarks |
|---|---|
| Fowler et al. [58] | Manual segmentation, lean versus obese pigs, T1-weighted 0.04 T multi-slice MRI, validation with post-mortem carcass chemical analysis |
| Mitchell et al. [59] | Manual segmentation, pig, T1- and T2-weighted 1.5 and 4.7 T multi-slice MRI, validation with post-mortem carcass chemical analysis |
| Ranefall et al. [60] | Automated segmentation based on histogram and region-growing schemes, mice, T1- and T2-weighted 9.4 T 3D MRI |
| Luu et al. [61] | Semi-automated segmentation, mice, microCT, cross-sectional study, in silico validation |
| Johnson et al. [62] | Semi-automated fat fraction-based segmentation, mice, chemical-shift encoded water–fat 7 T multi-slice MRI, cross-sectional study, in vitro validation |
| Johnson et al. [63] | |
| Tang et al. [64] | Automated segmentation based on adaptive fuzzy C-means method, T1-weighted 7 T multi-slice MRI, cross-sectional study |
| Sasser et al. [65] | Semi-automated segmentation, mice, CT, cross-sectional study |
| Garteiser et al. [66] | Semi-automated histogram-based segmentation, mice, water-suppressed 7 T multi-slice MRI, cross-sectional study, correlation with DXA |
| Gifford et al. [67] | Semi-automated fat fraction-based segmentation, dog, chemical-shift encoded water–fat 3 T multi-slice MRI, longitudinal study, correlation with scale weight |