Table 4.
Select references from recent literature reporting fully automated approaches in segmenting subcutaneous, visceral, and muscle adipose tissue depots, using CT and MRI data in humans
Compartment | Modality | References | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues | CT | Zhao et al. [142] | −190 to −30 HU threshold range, radial profile approach to identify tissue boundaries, compared single-slice measurements at L4 and L5 vertebrae to abdominal volume measurements |
Ohshima et al. [143] | −190 to −30 HU threshold range, radial profile approach to identify abdominal tissue boundaries | ||
Makrogiannis et al. [144] | FCM to identify air, muscle, fat, and bone tissues, single-slice approach at L4 and L5 vertebrae, separation of subcutaneous and visceral compartments using gradient vector flow, ACM, manual removal of signals from food residues in gastrointenstinal tract | ||
Nemoto et al. [145] | −190 to −30 HU threshold range, multi-slice approach, data rescaling, removal of air voxels, identification of bone, fat, and muscle voxels, morphological and region-growing operations, validation against manual segmentation, in men and women | ||
MRI | Liou et al. [146] | T1W and T2W 1.5 T MRI. Four pulse sequences, SI HT, RG, EM, correlation with MA, consideration for motion artifacts and atypical anatomies | |
Armao et al. [147] | Multi-slice FS 1.5 T MRI, SI HT, RG, correlation with MA | ||
Kullberg et al. [148] | 3D 1.5 T CSE WFI with continuously moving table, multi- parametric analysis of water-only, fat-only, in-phase (water + fat), water fraction, and fat fraction data, SI HT, MO, lung segmentation, geometric models to exclude bone marrow in spine and pelvis, correlation with MA | ||
Kullberg et al. [149] | 3D 1.5 T CSE WFI, exploits fat fraction data for HT, geometric model to exclude bone marrow and intermuscular adipose tissue, FCM, and MO, correlation with semi-automated analysis, correlation between single-slice and volume measurements, study in children | ||
Nakai et al. [150] | Multi-slice FS MRI, SI HT, template matching, correlation with MA, short-term longitudinal study | ||
Würslin et al. [151] | Multi-slice T1W 1.5 T MRI, whole-body analysis, SI HT, FCM, ACM, explicit detection of extremities, correlation with MA | ||
Zhou et al. [152] | Multi-slice FS 1.5 T MRI, with and without water suppression, SI HT, FCM, ACM and consideration of partial volume effects | ||
Wald et al. [153] | 3D 1.5 T CSE WFI, whole-body analysis, SI HT, statistical shape and appearance models, correlation with MA, large n = 314 cohort | ||
Joshi et al. [154] | 3D 3 T CSE WFI, atlas-based approach, correlation with MA | ||
Thörmer et al. [155] | Multi-slice 1.5 T CSE WFI, FCM, RG, ACM. Correlation with MA in obese cohort | ||
Addeman et al. [92] | 3D 3 T CSE WFI, exploits fat fraction and T2* data, conversion from Cartesian to polar coordinates, surface fitting, correlation with MA, cross-sectional study | ||
Sadananthan et al. [156] | Multi-slice 3 T CSE WFI, EM, segmentation of superficial and deep subcutaneous depots using graph cut and level set methods, correlation with semi-automated analysis, cross- sectional study | ||
Inter- and intra-muscular adipose tissues | CT | Senseney et al. [157] | Medical Imaging Processing, Analysis, and Visualization (MIPAV) software from the National Institutes of Health (http://mipav.cit.nih.gov/) |
MRI | Positano et al. [158] | Multi-slice T1W 1.5 T MRI, FCM, ACM, SI HT, EM algorithm, correlation with MA | |
Prescott et al. [159] | Multi-slice T1W MRI, emphasis on interstitial adipose tissue in OA patients, N3 bias field correction, signal normalization, MO, RG, correlation with MA | ||
Makrogiannis et al. [160] | 3D FS 3 T MRI, multi-parametric approach using water-suppressed and fat-suppressed complementary images, N3 bias field correction, K-means clustering, parametric deformable and ACM, correlation with CT | ||
Valentinitsch et al. [161] | 3D 3 T CSE WFI, OA and type 2 diabetes cohort, comparison with MA, multi-parametric approach using water-only, fat- only, and in-phase (water + fat) images, K-means clustering, MO, and RG |
Additional relevant citations are found therein
ACM active contour models, CSE WFI chemical-shift encoded water–fat MRI, EM expectation/maximization, FCM fuzzy C-means (clustering), FS frequency-selective, HT histogram thresholding, MA manual segmentation analysis, MO morphological operations, OA osteoarthritis, RG region growing, SI signal intensity, T1W/T2W T1-/T2-weighted