Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: MAGMA. 2015 Sep 4;29(2):259–276. doi: 10.1007/s10334-015-0498-z

Table 4.

Select references from recent literature reporting fully automated approaches in segmenting subcutaneous, visceral, and muscle adipose tissue depots, using CT and MRI data in humans

Compartment Modality References Remarks
Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues CT Zhao et al. [142] −190 to −30 HU threshold range, radial profile approach to identify tissue boundaries, compared single-slice measurements at L4 and L5 vertebrae to abdominal volume measurements
Ohshima et al. [143] −190 to −30 HU threshold range, radial profile approach to identify abdominal tissue boundaries
Makrogiannis et al. [144] FCM to identify air, muscle, fat, and bone tissues, single-slice approach at L4 and L5 vertebrae, separation of subcutaneous and visceral compartments using gradient vector flow, ACM, manual removal of signals from food residues in gastrointenstinal tract
Nemoto et al. [145] −190 to −30 HU threshold range, multi-slice approach, data rescaling, removal of air voxels, identification of bone, fat, and muscle voxels, morphological and region-growing operations, validation against manual segmentation, in men and women
MRI Liou et al. [146] T1W and T2W 1.5 T MRI. Four pulse sequences, SI HT, RG, EM, correlation with MA, consideration for motion artifacts and atypical anatomies
Armao et al. [147] Multi-slice FS 1.5 T MRI, SI HT, RG, correlation with MA
Kullberg et al. [148] 3D 1.5 T CSE WFI with continuously moving table, multi- parametric analysis of water-only, fat-only, in-phase (water + fat), water fraction, and fat fraction data, SI HT, MO, lung segmentation, geometric models to exclude bone marrow in spine and pelvis, correlation with MA
Kullberg et al. [149] 3D 1.5 T CSE WFI, exploits fat fraction data for HT, geometric model to exclude bone marrow and intermuscular adipose tissue, FCM, and MO, correlation with semi-automated analysis, correlation between single-slice and volume measurements, study in children
Nakai et al. [150] Multi-slice FS MRI, SI HT, template matching, correlation with MA, short-term longitudinal study
Würslin et al. [151] Multi-slice T1W 1.5 T MRI, whole-body analysis, SI HT, FCM, ACM, explicit detection of extremities, correlation with MA
Zhou et al. [152] Multi-slice FS 1.5 T MRI, with and without water suppression, SI HT, FCM, ACM and consideration of partial volume effects
Wald et al. [153] 3D 1.5 T CSE WFI, whole-body analysis, SI HT, statistical shape and appearance models, correlation with MA, large n = 314 cohort
Joshi et al. [154] 3D 3 T CSE WFI, atlas-based approach, correlation with MA
Thörmer et al. [155] Multi-slice 1.5 T CSE WFI, FCM, RG, ACM. Correlation with MA in obese cohort
Addeman et al. [92] 3D 3 T CSE WFI, exploits fat fraction and T2* data, conversion from Cartesian to polar coordinates, surface fitting, correlation with MA, cross-sectional study
Sadananthan et al. [156] Multi-slice 3 T CSE WFI, EM, segmentation of superficial and deep subcutaneous depots using graph cut and level set methods, correlation with semi-automated analysis, cross- sectional study
Inter- and intra-muscular adipose tissues CT Senseney et al. [157] Medical Imaging Processing, Analysis, and Visualization (MIPAV) software from the National Institutes of Health (http://mipav.cit.nih.gov/)
MRI Positano et al. [158] Multi-slice T1W 1.5 T MRI, FCM, ACM, SI HT, EM algorithm, correlation with MA
Prescott et al. [159] Multi-slice T1W MRI, emphasis on interstitial adipose tissue in OA patients, N3 bias field correction, signal normalization, MO, RG, correlation with MA
Makrogiannis et al. [160] 3D FS 3 T MRI, multi-parametric approach using water-suppressed and fat-suppressed complementary images, N3 bias field correction, K-means clustering, parametric deformable and ACM, correlation with CT
Valentinitsch et al. [161] 3D 3 T CSE WFI, OA and type 2 diabetes cohort, comparison with MA, multi-parametric approach using water-only, fat- only, and in-phase (water + fat) images, K-means clustering, MO, and RG

Additional relevant citations are found therein

ACM active contour models, CSE WFI chemical-shift encoded water–fat MRI, EM expectation/maximization, FCM fuzzy C-means (clustering), FS frequency-selective, HT histogram thresholding, MA manual segmentation analysis, MO morphological operations, OA osteoarthritis, RG region growing, SI signal intensity, T1W/T2W T1-/T2-weighted