TABLE 2.
Embryonic development after the microinjection of LNA
Note: values with different superscripts within columns denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
| Groups | Repeats | Embryos | Blastocyst (%) | Embryos arrested at two/four-cell stage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT | Con | 3 | 101 | 18 (17.46 ± 4.55)a | 31 (32.76 ± 5.78)a |
| REST-LNA | 3 | 98 | 3 (3.06 ± 0.12)b | 60 (60.39 ± 5.21)b | |
| Con-LNA | 3 | 102 | 16 (15.37 ± 4.72)a | 29 (27.39 ± 4.21)a | |
| Con | 4 | 160 | 21 (12.24 ± 4.08) | 74 (44.25 ± 11.78) | |
| IVF | REST-LNA | 4 | 160 | 19 (10.38 ± 4.60) | 75 (46.47 ± 11.33) |
| Con-LNA | 4 | 160 | 26 (15.82 ± 6.86) | 79 (50.35 ± 8.33) | |
| Con | 3 | 98 | 24 (24.35 ± 5.52) | 20 (22.56 ± 2.61) | |
| ICSI | REST-LNA | 3 | 86 | 19 (22.86 ± 2.98) | 23 (27.32 ± 2.22) |
| Con-LNA | 3 | 92 | 22 (25.32 ± 4,73) | 22 (24.28 ± 5.08) | |