Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;7(8):4985–4989. doi: 10.1039/c6sc01086e

Table 1. Selected optimization studies a .

Inline graphic
Entry Leaving group Solvent 2a/2′a % conv. a % yield b
1 OMs DME 70 : 30 82 44
2 OP(O)(OEt)2 DME 90 : 10 42 27
3 OTroc DME n.d. 0
4 OCOC6F5 DME 71 : 29 66 22
5 OSO2Ph DME 75 : 25 100 61
6 OP(O)(OPh)2 DME 74 : 26 100 58
7 Br DME 94 : 6 100 77
8 b Br DME 89 : 11 100 68
9 c Br DME 100 0
10 Br THF 82 : 18 100 63
11 Br Et2O 0 0
12 d Br DME 0 0

aAll reactions were performed on 0.5 mmol scale using CuCN (0.5 mmol).

bThe reaction was run using CuI (0.5 mmol).

cThe reaction was run using CuSPh (0.5 mmol).

dThe reaction was performed in the absence of copper(i) salts.