Table I.
Line | Class (Cluster) | Amount
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Mean ± se | N | ||
μg h−1 g−1 shoot dry weight | |||
W401 | EAD (7) | 0.7 ± 0.2 a | 6 |
F7 | EUF (10) | 0.9 ± 0.2 ab | 9 |
MIS3a | LSC (5) | 1.9 ± 0.5 abc | 6 |
F113 | EAD (7) | 2.9 ± 0.2 bcd | 6 |
F752 | EUF (12) | 3.4 ± 0.9 bcd | 6 |
MIS4ab | M13 (3) | 5.0 ± 0.7 cdef | 6 |
F584 | RYD (9) | 5.7 ± 1.6 cdef | 5 |
F284 | M13 (3) | 6.0 ± 2.5 cde | 6 |
F292 | EAD (7) | 8.8 ± 2.1 defg | 6 |
F591 | M13 (3) | 10.3 ± 1.1 defgh | 5 |
CM174 | RYD (9) | 11.4 ± 3.7 defg | 6 |
Co158 | M13 (3) | 11.4 ± 1.6 defghi | 6 |
F618 | RYD (9) | 11.9 ± 2.6 defgh | 6 |
F608 | M13 (3) | 12.3 ± 2.6 defgh | 6 |
F670 | M13 (1) | 15.6 ± 4.6 efghij | 6 |
A188 | M13 (3) | 15.8 ± 3.7 efghij | 6 |
F252 | EAD (6) | 20.8 ± 3.7 fghij | 6 |
F268 | EUF (11) | 21.0 ± 5.9 efghij | 6 |
RYD2a | RYD (9) | 21.4 ± 3.4 ghij | 5 |
F283 | EUF (10) | 23.4 ± 5.3 ghij | 5 |
Ia5pop | 24.6 ± 7.3 fghij | 6 | |
F2 | EUF (11) | 27.7 ± 3.9 ghij | 6 |
F7001 | EUF (10) | 28.8 ± 8.2 ghij | 5 |
Co255b | EUF (10) | 29.5 ± 5.4 ghij | 6 |
A654 | M13 (1) | 38.6 ± 5.8 hij | 5 |
C6 | 39.2 ± 3.4 hij | 6 | |
Delprim | 42.5 ± 10.8 hij | 6 | |
Io3a | M13 (2) | 44.9 ± 4.1 ij | 6 |
Du101 | EUF (10) | 48.0 ± 4.9 j | 6 |
F476 | RYD (9) | 50.2 ± 4.1 j | 6 |
Io4a | M13 (2) | 51.1 ± 8.9 j | 6 |
F1852 | M13 (1) | 54.2 ± 7.3 j | 6 |
Lines with the same letter are not significantly different at the 1% level according to the Bonferroni/Dunn posthoc test (ANOVA with ln-transformed values: F = 30.3; degrees of freedom = 31; P < 0.0001). Classes and clusters defined according to a dendrogram obtained by cluster analysis of RFLP markers (Dubreuil et al., 1996): EAD, Early Dent; EUF, European Flint; LSC, Lancaster Sure Crop; M13, Minnesota 13 complex; RYD, Reid Yellow Dent.
Private lines, names changed.
Lines derived from crosses between lines tracing back to two different heterotic groups.