TABLE 2.
Summary of advantages and disadvantages associated with the bacterial immobilization methods employed in this study
| Immobilization method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical trapping | Simple preparation | Rod-shaped bacteria are difficult to trap |
| No chemical pretreatment of either the tip or bacteria | Cells may be compressed as a result of applied vacuum | |
| Physicochemical properties of bacterial cell remain unchanged | EPS may accumulate on the top of a trapped bacterium | |
| Exact positioning of the tip on the bacterial cell surface | ||
| Contact area can be estimated based on the dimensions of the tip | ||
| Physical adsorption | Simple preparation | Chemical treatment of the substratum is required |
| Bacteria with different shapes and dimensions can be studied | Physicochemical properties of bacterial cell surface are possibly affected by the surface modification | |
| Exact positioning of the tip on the bacterial cell surface | Immobilization not always adequate for different strains (11) | |
| Contact area can be estimated based on the dimensions of the tip | ||
| Bacterium-coated tip | Versatile choice of substratum | Long and difficult preparation procedure |
| Requires chemical treatment of both bacterial cell and substratum surface | ||
| Physicochemical and mechanical properties of the bacterial cell surface change | ||
| The number of interacting cells is unknown, as is their spatial orientation when interacting with the substratum | ||
| Bacterium-coated tips need to be checked regularly for full coverage by electron microscopy |