Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Obes. 2016 May 10;12(4):337–345. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12148

Table 2.

Percent overweight and change from baseline (Δ) across study visits by treatment group*

Percent overweight and Δ
Pairwise comparison P value
M M+R M+L M vs. M+R M vs. M+L M+R vs. M+L

Baseline 80.1 ± 38.1 80.2 ± 38.3 74.6 ± 36.4
n at baseline 193 201 201
Month 6 79.2 ± 38.3 81.1 ± 39.3 70.7 ± 37.4
    Δ 6-0 −0.9 ± 8.3 +0.8 ± 8.9 −3.9 ± 9.2 0.1276 0.0069 <.0001
Month 12 76.8 ± 40.0 84.1 ± 41.1 70.7 ± 38.7
    Δ 12-0 −2.0 ± 10.9 +3.0 ± 12.4 −4.2 ± 11.6 <.0001 0.1272 <.0001
Month 24 77.4 ± 41.8 85.6 ± 38.9 72.4 ± 39.7
    Δ 24-0 −2.4 ± 14.4 +4.3 ± 17.4 −33 ± 14.5 <.0001 0.6409 <.0001
*

Mean ± SD are presented. The three treatment groups are the following: metformin monotherapy (M), metformin plus rosiglitazone (M+R), and metformin plus intensive lifestyle (M+L). The P values were calculated from repeated measures models testing for Pairwise treatment differences in percent overweight change during the first 2 years of the study. The P values presented are from adjusted models for baseline percent overweight, time, treatment, sex, age at baseline, race/ethnicity, percent overweight change during run-in, and an interaction term for time-by-treatment.