Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep;16(9):2307–2322. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.024919

Table 2.

Pollination Behaviors of the TAC26 Transgenic Petunia T1 Progeny

Cross-Pollination
Planta Self-Pollinationb WT Femalec WT Maled
l1 9/11 (89.1 ± 19.6) 10/10 (102.0 ± 12.3) 0/12 (0)
l2e 10/10 (222.7 ± 42.5) 11/12 (117.5 ± 20.8) 13/13 (201.5 ± 23.7)
l3e 10/10 (79.9 ± 10.98) 9/10 (109.7 ± 24.4) 11/11 (176.5 ± 18.3)
l4f 7/8 (186.43 ± 29.44) 7/7 (91.4 ± 8.6) 13/13 (0)
l5f 8/9 (104.0 ± 16.1) 11/12 (196.5 ± 18.2) 0/16 (0)
l7e 11/11 (225.5 ± 40.8) 10/10 (230.7 ± 21.2) 8/8 (207.9 ± 20.0)
l8 10/10 (202.1 ± 35.3) 14/14 (230.6 ± 21.2) 0/18 (0)
b1fg 0/17 (0) 0/18 (0) 0/12 (0)
b2fg 0/15 (0) 0/21 (0) 0/14 (0)
b3 10/12 (70.9 ± 14.0) 12/12 (260 ± 22.7) 0/16 (0)
WT 0/25 (0) h
a

b, g, l, and m are four transgenic lines, and WT is the wild-type S3S3 plant.

b

Data are represented as mature capsules/total pollination sets (average seeds per capsule ± sd).

c

The pollen from the transgenic plants were used to pollinate mature styles from the wild-type S3S3 plants.

d

The pollen from the wild-type plants were used to pollinate mature styles from the transgenic plants.

e

Plants with low or undetectable expression of PhS3-RNase.

f

Plants with low or undetectable expression of introduced AhS2-RNase.

g

Plants with low or undetectable expression of introduced AhSLF-S2.

h

Not applicable.