Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 16;35(1):65–82. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0451-7

Table 5.

Characteristics of included studies (n = 33)

No First author, year Title Setting 2013 GDP per capita (I$) Model Interventions compareda Perspective Quality assessment score
1 Aponte-Gonzalez et al. 2013 [20] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines from a societal perspective in Colombia Colombia 12,424 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination (bivalent and quadrivalent) Societal perspective 22/22
2 Berkhof et al. 2013 [21] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Turkmenistan, Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria 3213–14,004 Static proportionate outcomes model No prevention, vaccination Health care payer’s perspective (most likely) 22/22
3 Campos et al. 2012 [22] Health and economic impact of HPV 16/18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Eastern Africa Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda Kenya 2795; Mozambique 1105; Tanzania 2443; Uganda 1674 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal perspective 19/22
4 Canfell et al. 2011 [23] Prevention of cervical cancer in rural China: evaluation of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening strategies Rural China 11,907 Hybrid model (dynamic model interfaced with a cohort model) No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal perspective 20/21
5 Colantonio et al. 2009 [24] Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cervical cancer vaccine in five Latin American countries Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Perub 11,774–15,038 Static progression model Vaccination, screening Health provider’s perspective 22/22
6 Diaz et al. 2008 [25] Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India India 5418 Static Progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal 20/22
7 Fonseca et al. 2013 [26] Cost-effectiveness of the vaccine against human papillomavirus in the Brazilian Amazon region Brazil 15,038 Static progression model Vaccination, screening Provider’s perspective 21/22
8 Ginsberg et al. 2009 [27] Screening, prevention and treatment of cervical cancer—a global and regional generalized cost-effectiveness analysis Multi-country Varies State proportionate outcome model No prevention, vaccination, screening Health providers perspective 20/22
9 Goldie et al. 2007 [30] Cost-effectiveness of HPV 16, 18 vaccination in Brazil Brazil 15,038 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal perspective 20/22
10 Goldie et al. 2008 [28] Mathematical models of cervical cancer prevention in Latin America and the Caribbean 33 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean Varies Static proportionate outcome model and a microsimulation model (for 8 countries) Vaccination, screening Societal perspective 21/22
11 Goldie et al. 2008 [29] Mathematical models of cervical cancer prevention in the Asia Pacific region 25 Asian countries (22 Gavi eligible countries) Varies Static proportionate outcome model and a microsimulation model (for 2 countries) No prevention, vaccination, screening (for selected countries) Societal perspective 20/22
12 Goldie et al. 2008 [32] Health and economic outcomes of HPV 16,18 vaccination in 72 GAVI-eligible countries 72 Gavi-eligible countries Varies Static proportionate outcome model and microsimulation model of selected countries (for comparative validation) No prevention, vaccination Societal perspective 21/22
13 Goldie et al. 2012 [31] Health and economic impact of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 vaccination of preadolescent girls and cervical cancer screening of adult women in Peru Peru 11,774 Static microsimulation model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal perspective 20/22
14 Gutierrez-Aguado, 2011 [33] Cost-utility of the vaccine against the human papiloma virus in Peruvian women Peru 11,774 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination Health provider’s perspective 22/22
15 Gutierrez-Delgado et al. 2008 [34] Generalized cost-effectiveness of preventive interventions against cervical cancer in Mexican women: results of a Markov model from the public sector perspective Mexico 16,370 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Health provider’s perspective 20/22
16 Insinga et al. 2007 [35] Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Mexico: a transmission dynamic model-based evaluation Mexico 16,370 Transmission dynamic model Vaccination (boys and girls), screening Health provider’s perspective 22/22
17 Jit et al. 2014 [36] Cost-effectiveness of female human papillomavirus vaccination in 179 countries: a PRIME modelling study 179 Gavi-eligible countries Varies Static proportionate outcomes model No prevention, vaccination Varies 22/22
18 Kawai et al. 2012 [37] Estimated health and economic impact of quadrivalent HPV (types 6/11/16/18) vaccination in Brazil using a transmission dynamic model Brazil 15,038 Transmission dynamic model No prevention, vaccination, catch-up vaccination (12- to 26-year-old females) Health system perspective 21/22
19 Khatibi et al. 2014 [38] Cost-effectiveness evaluation of quadrivalent human papilloma virus vaccine for HPV-related disease in Iran Iran 15,590 Static proportionate outcomes model No prevention, vaccination Health provider’s perspective 22/22
20 Kiatpongsan and Kim, 2014 [39] Costs and cost-effectiveness of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in two East African countries Kenya, Uganda Kenya 2795; Uganda 1674 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination Not specified 21/21
21 Kim et al. 2007 [40] The value of including boys in an HPV vaccination programme: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a low-resource setting Brazil 15,038 Transmission dynamic model No prevention, vaccination (boys and girls), catch-up vaccination (12- to 26-year-old females) Societal perspective 21/22
22 Kim et al. 2008 [42] Exploring the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in Vietnam: insights for evidence-based cervical cancer prevention policy Vietnam 5294 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal perspective 22/22
23 Kim et al. 2011 [44] Comparative evaluation of the potential impact of rotavirus versus HPV vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries: a preliminary analysis focused on the relative disease burden 72 Gavi-eligible countries Varies Static proportionate outcomes model No prevention, vaccination Societal perspective 20/22
24 Kim et al. 2013 [41] Model-based impact and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in sub-Saharan Africa 48 sub-Saharan African countries Varies Static proportionate outcomes model and static progression model (for South Africa and Uganda) No prevention, vaccination, screening (South Africa and Uganda) Societal perspective 22/22
25 Kim et al. 2013 [43] Model-based impact and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in the Extended Middle East and North Africa (EMENA) 20 Extended Middle East and North African countries Varies Static proportionate outcomes model and static progression model (for Algeria, Lebanon, Turkey) No prevention, vaccination, screening (Algeria, Lebanon, Turkey) Societal perspective 22/22
26 Levin et al. 2015 [45] An extended cost-effectiveness analysis of publicly financed HPV vaccination to prevent cervical cancer in China China 11,907 Static microsimulation model Vaccination, screening Societal perspective 21/22
27 Praditsitthikorn et al. 2011 [46] Economic evaluation of policy options for prevention and control of cervical cancer in Thailand Thailand 14,394 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal and health provider’s perspective 22/22
28 Reynales-Shigematsu et al. 2009 [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quadrivalent human papilloma virus vaccine in Mexico Mexico 16,370 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Health provider’s perspective 22/22
29 Sharma et al. 2012 [48] Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Thailand Thailand 14,394 Static progression model No prevention, vaccination, screening Societal perspective 22/22
30 Sinanovic et al. 2009 [49] The potential cost-effectiveness of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to the cervical cancer screening programme in South Africa South Africa 12,867 Static progression model Vaccination, screening Health provider’s and societal perspective 22/22
31 Termrungruanglert et al. 2012 [50] Cost and effectiveness evaluation of prophylactic HPV vaccine in developing countries Thailand 14,394 Static progression model Vaccination, screening Health provider’s perspective 22/22
32 Tracy et al. 2014 [51] Planning for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: a modeling-based approach Mali 1642 Transmission dynamic model No prevention, vaccination Not specified 19/22
33 Vanni et al. 2012 [52] Economic modelling assessment of the HPV quadrivalent vaccine in Brazil: a dynamic individual-based approach Brazil 15,038 Transmission dynamic model Vaccination, screening Health provider’s perspective 19/22

HPV human papillomavirus, I$ international dollars, LMICs low- and middle-income countries

aVaccination targets girls prior to sexual exposure (typically 9–12 years old)

bArgentina and Chile are not classed as LMICs