Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 31;37(1):71–83. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0462-3

Table 5.

Summary of productivity loss (US$) by dose adjustment cohort

Component No dose adjustment, n = 227 One dose adjustment, n = 122 Two dose adjustments, n = 47 Three or more dose adjustments, n = 58
Productivity loss per patient (95% CI) Productivity loss per patient (95% CI) Difference vs. no dose adjustment group Productivity loss per patient (95% CI) Difference vs. no dose adjustment group Productivity loss per patient (95% CI) Difference vs. no dose adjustment group
Laboratory tests $271**,***,**** ($236–$307) $405*,**** ($353–$457) +$134 $458* ($394–$523) +$187 $574*,** ($497–$650) +$303
Specialist visits $12 ($9–$14) $12 ($9–$15) +$0 $12 ($9–$15) +$0 $14 ($9–$20) +$2
Office visits $424**,**** ($355-$493) $609* ($506-$712) +$185 $591 ($506−$712) +$167 $763* ($595−$931) +$339
ED visits $55**** ($37–$73) $87 ($53–$121) +$32 $30**** ($7–$53) −$25 $139*,*** ($56–$223) +$84
Hospitalizations $222 ($152–$291) $268 ($162–$375) +$46 $71* ($16–$126) −$151 $343*** ($152–$535) +$121
Total $984**** ($832–$1135) $1381*,**** ($1157–$1607) +$397 $1162**** ($965–$1361) +$178 $1833*,**,*** ($1485–$2182) +$849

One-way ANOVA was used to compare costs between cohorts. A Tukey multiple comparison procedure was used following a significant ANOVA result (p < 0.05) where appropriate

ANOVA analysis of variance, CI confidence interval, ED emergency department

* p < 0.05 vs. no dose adjustment group; ** p < 0.05 vs. one dose adjustment group; *** p < 0.05 vs. two dose adjustments group; **** p < 0.05 vs. three or more dose adjustments group