Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 3;13:1. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0931-1

Table 3.

The gap analysis model: criteria considered, levels within the criteria, scores and applied weighting coefficients (Coef)

Criteria Scores Coef Total (score*coef)
Diagnostic tools 2 1 0 −1 −2 4.17 /100
 1. Availabilitya
 2. Prevention and control - Differentiation of infected from vaccinated (DIVA)
 3. Strategic reserve
 4. Capacity of production
 5. Market potential
 6. Affordable
 7. Quality/stability durability
 8. Sensitivity
 9. Specificity
 10. Reproducibility
 11. Simplicity/ease of use
 12. Speed
Vaccination tools 2 1 0 −1 −2 4.55 /100
 1. Commercial availabilitya
 2. Monitoring for infection in a vaccinated population
 3. Strategic reserve
 4. Capacity of production
 5. Market potential
 6. Affordable
 7. Quality/stability
 8. Safety of vaccines
 9. Efficacy
 10. Immunity
 11. Convenience of use
Pharmaceutical tools 2 1 0 −1 −2 4.55 /100
 1. Availabilitya
 2. Prevention and control
 3. Strategic reserve
 4. Capacity of production
 5. Market potential
 6. Cost
 7. Quality
 8. Safety animal
 9. Safety consumer/user concerns
 10. Safety environment
 11. Resistance
Total Score:

aA maximum score of 20 was given to the whole criterion when there isn’t any product available (not even under development)