Table 1.
Study characteristics and outcomes of interest reported by each of the included studies
| Reference | Design | I | C | FemalesN (%) | Matching | Stoma indication | Study quality | Complications of stoma construction | Complications of stoma closure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwards et al.[35] | RCT | 34 | 36 | 21 (30.0) | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 | n/c | 4 | a3 a4, a5, a7 | b1, b2, b4, | |
| Law et al.[36] | RCT | 42 | 38 | 31 (38.8) | 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 7, 8 | c | 4 | a1, a3, a4, a5, a9, a11 | b1, b3 | |
| Gastinger et al.[37] | PNR | 407 | 229 | n/c | 1, 2, 4, 5 | n/c | **** | b1, b3, b5 | ||
| Rullier et al.[38] | RET | 107 | 60 | 46 (27.5) | 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 7 | a, b | ****** | a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10 | b1, b2, b3, b4, b5 | |
| Mala et al.[39] | RET | 62 | 10 | 32 (44) | 1, 2, 4, 6, | c | ***** | a1, a5, a11 | b1, b2, b3, b4, b5 |
I, ileostomy; C, colostomy; PNR, prospective non-randomized; RET, retrospective; RCT, randomized controlled trial; n/c, no comment. 1, age; 2, gender, 3, body mass index; 4, diagnosis of rectal cancer, 5, tumor level; 6, anastomosis level; 7, tumor stage; 8, anastomosis method; a, poor bowel preparation; b, technical anastomotic problem; c, anastomosis <6cm.
Complications of stoma construction: dehydration (a1); necrosis (a2); prolapse (a3); retraction (a4); parastomal hernia (a5); stenosis (a6); sepsis (a7); haemorrhage (a8); skin irritation (a9); obstruction (a10); anastomotic leak or fistula (a11).
Complications of stoma closure: obstruction (b1); wound infection (b2); anastomotic leak or fistula (b3); incisional hernia (b4); death (b5).