Table 4.
Logistic Regression for Detection of Lesions With Significant Ischemia
| OR | 95% CI | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable | |||
| MLD, per 1 mm | 6.99 | 2.99–16.35 | <0.001 |
| Diameter stenosis, per 5% | 1.40 | 1.22–1.62 | <0.001 |
| MLA, per 1 mm2 | 1.96 | 1.43–2.68 | <0.001 |
| Area stenosis, per 5% | 1.33 | 1.18–1.50 | <0.001 |
| PR | 13.91 | 6.35–30.5 | <0.001 |
| LAP | 7.61 | 3.33–17.40 | <0.001 |
| SC | 3.28 | 1.27–8.47 | 0.014 |
| High WSS group, vs low WSS group | 3.33 | 1.45–7.66 | 0.005 |
| Multivariable | |||
| Model 1 | |||
| MLD, per 1 mm | 6.09 | 2.55–14.50 | <0.001 |
| High WSS group, vs low WSS group | 2.08 | 0.85–5.12 | 0.110 |
| Model 2 | |||
| PR | 10.51 | 4.38–25.21 | <0.001 |
| LAP | 3.09 | 1.15–8.35 | 0.026 |
| High WSS group, vs low WSS group | 1.79 | 0.64–4.96 | 0.265 |
| Model 3 | |||
| MLD, per 1 mm | 6.18 | 2.24–17.09 | <0.001 |
| PR | 12.02 | 4.67–30.99 | <0.001 |
| LAP | 2.41 | 0.84–6.95 | 0.104 |
| High WSS group, vs low WSS group | 1.34 | 0.45–3.99 | 0.436 |
LAP indicates low attenuation plaque; MLA, minimal luminal area; MLD, minimal luminal diameter; OR, odds ratio; PR, positive remodeling; SC, spotty calcification; WSS, wall shear stress.