. 2016 Dec 12;5(12):e003957. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003957

Table 4.

NT‐proBNP Reaction in Both Randomized Groups Directly After RFA Compared to Baseline

	Baseline	95% CI	Directly After RFA	95% CI	P _{time×randomization}
NT‐proBNP_{int fv (pg/mL) n=29}	63.9	45.1 to 90.5	86.9	63 to 116.7	<0.001^a
NT‐proBNP_{con fv (pg/mL) n=16}	97.5	61.1 to 155.7	102.1	65.6 to 158.9	<0.001^a

NT‐proBNP levels are presented as geometric means with 95% CI. Results from repeated‐measure ANOVA within‐subjects contrast tests are presented and considered statistically significant after Benjamini‐Hochberg correction. ANOVA indicates analysis of variance; CI, confidence interval; con, control group; fv, femoral vein; int, intervention group; n, number of patients available for analysis; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro B‐type natriuretic peptide.

Statistical significant P values after correction for false discovery rate.