Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 9;5:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-64

Table 2.

Test for 96 well plate handling error. a) In this table we see that the middle bank of comparisons indicates a discrepancy between data from the first PCR run and the second, at the 96-well plate level. b) A check of the distance matrix results show that the swapped plates are h and i in one case, and n and o in the other. Bold indicates P-value = 0.3, italic indicates P-values between 1.0E-03 and 1.0E-04, while regular font indicates P-values < 1.0E-04.

a) R_{m, m}

PCR Round 1 vs 1 PCR Round 1 vs 2 PCR Round 2 vs 2
Plates A1 v A2 A2 v A3 A3 v A4 A4 v A5 A2 v B1 A3 v B2 A4 v B3 A5 v B4 B1 v B2 B5 v B3 B1 v B4 B5 v B4

{a, a} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
{b, b} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 3 1
{c, c} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{d, d} 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 9 1 1 1 1
{e, e} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
{f, f} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{g, g} 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
{h, h} 1 1 1 1 343 322 408 294 1 1 1 1
{i, i} 2 1 1 1 421 290 402 359 1 1 1 1
{j, j} 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 1
{k, k} 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{l, l} 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
{m, m} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{n, n} 1 1 1 1 255 141 20 167 1 1 1 1
{o, o} 1 1 1 1 330 248 357 277 3 1 5 6
{p, p} 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1
{q, q} 1 1 1 1 4 3 3 2 1 1 1 1
{r, r} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 5 1
{s, s} 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{t, t} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{u, u} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
{v, v} 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1
{w, w} 2 1 1 1 1 16 1 2 1 1 1 1
b) A2 v B1 A3 v B2 A4 v B3 A5 v B4

D_{mm} D_{mn} D_{mm} D_{mn} D_{mm} D_{mn} D_{mm} D_{mn}

MEAN 0.33 0.97 0.34 0.89 0.44 0.98 0.37 0.96
SD 0.2 0.11 0.2 0.13 0.21 0.11 0.21 0.12
{h, h} 0.99 1.02 1.07 1
{i, i} 1.09 1 1.07 1.06
{h, i} 0.22 0.09 0.33 0.31
{i, h} 0.28 0.07 0.11 0.14
{n, n} 0.98 0.91 0.85 0.92
{o, o} 1.01 1.02 1.07 1.02
{n, o} 0.1 0.51 0.45 0.52
{o, n} 0.04 0.17 0.11 0.05