Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 22;2016:5120760. doi: 10.1155/2016/5120760

Table 3.

Functional albumin parameters in different subjects groups.

Parameters Control (n = 60) NAFLD (n = 23) Hepatitis (n = 37) Cirrhosis
Child-Pugh class A Child-Pugh class B Child-Pugh class C
(n = 81) (n = 30) (n = 22)
IMAT 0.59 ± 0.06 0.42 ± 0.16 0.41 ± 0.12 0.51 ± 0.13∗⊿ 0.38 ± 0.12 0.22 ± 0.06#
IMAT/albumin (10−2) 1.27 ± 0.15 0.88 ± 0.32 0.87 ± 0.24 1.25 ± 0.32# 1.15 ± 0.35 0.77 ± 0.22†§
TBS (108) 6.03 ± 0.36 5.69 ± 0.31 5.42 ± 0.22 5.34 ± 0.32# 5.97 ± 0.58 5.48 ± 0.46§
TBS/albumin (107) 1.30 ± 0.14 1.19 ± 0.09 1.18 ± 0.12 1.29 ± 0.15 1.86 ± 0.29# 1.88 ± 0.32#
H/L 0.76 ± 0.08 0.73 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.04# 0.72 ± 0.02 0.68 ± 0.04# 0.59 ± 0.10#†

Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviation.

P < 0.01 compared with control group; # P < 0.01 compared with NAFLD group.

P < 0.01 compared with hepatitis group; P < 0.01 compared with Child-Pugh class A group.

§ P < 0.01 compared with Child-Pugh class B group.