Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Public Health Genomics. 2016 Nov 4;19(6):325–335. doi: 10.1159/000452094

Table 6.

Adjusted odds ratios for participating in various levels of genetic research, US Sample

Participate Secondary analysis Share with private company Cell lines
Yes v No Yes v No Yes v No Yes v No
n=228 v n=174 n=153 v n=294 n=114 v n=305 n=152 v. n=231
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Not Christian
No -- -- -- 1.6 (1.0, 2.6)
Yes -- -- -- Reference
Ethical positioning score (continuous)a
Ethics - Idealism -- -- -- --
Ethics - Relativism -- -- -- 1.1 (1.0, 1.1)
Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales (continuous)b
Internal score 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) -- -- --
Powerful other score -- -- -- --
Chance score -- -- 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 1.0 (1.0, 1.1)
Doctors score 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) -- -- --
Other people score -- -- -- --
Genetic research could help find new treatments
Very likely or likely 4.7 (2.0, 11.2) 3.1 (1.3, 7.2) -- 5.5 (1.9, 16.0)
Neutral, unlikely, or very unlikely Reference Reference -- Reference
It may help my children or future families
Very likely or likely 3.0 (1.2, 7.1) 3.6 (1.5, 8.6) 10.9 (3.2, 36.7) 8.3 (2.6, 27.0)
Neutral, unlikely, or very unlikely Reference Reference Reference Reference
It would help us understand inherited diseases
Very likely or likely 3.7 (1.3, 10.8) -- -- --
Neutral, unlikely, or very unlikely Reference -- -- --
I have concerns
No 1.9 (1.0, 3.5) 2.7 (1.6, 4.6) 2.1 (1.2, 3.7) 2.0 (1.0, 3.7)
Yes Reference Reference Reference Reference
Not concerned about my family's history not being protected
Yes 3.6 (2.1, 6.0) 1.8 (1.1, 3.2) 2.2 (1.2, 4.1) 2.7 (1.5, 4.9)
No Reference Reference Reference Reference
Not concerned about how and where the data will be kept.
Yes -- 1.8 (1.0, 3.5) 2.3 (1.2, 4.6) 1.8 (0.9, 3.8)
No -- Reference Reference Reference

Variables not included in any of the final models include: age, gender, education, own a car, own a house, and general health questions.

a

Ethical positioning questions are divided into two scores: 1) Relativism (possible scores from 6-30) and 2) Idealism (possible score of 5-25). The relativism score pertains to an individual's moral principles. The idealism score measures an individual's concern for consequences.

b

MHLC scales for internal, chance, and powerful others have a possible range of 6-36; doctors and others scale has a possible range of 3-18.