Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;35(2):196–206. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1161205

Table 2.

Comparison of kinetic and kinematic variables during the two vertical jumps, counter movement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) between the AMTI force plate, PedarX and OpenGo.

  Mean ± SD
Bias (%)
95% limits of agreement (% grouped mean)
  AMTI PedarX OpenGo OpenGo vs. AMTI PedarX vs. AMTI OpenGo vs. PedarX OpenGo vs. AMTI PedarX vs. AMTI OpenGo vs. PedarX
Weight (N) 773 ± 113 771 ± 109 616 ± 139 −155 (−20%) 10 (0%) −165 (−20%) 174 (25%) 191 (25%) 234 (33%)
Impulse CMJ (Ns) 941 ± 180 1013 ± 165$ 821 ± 148 −114 (−13%) 83 (8%) −197 (−19%) 195 (22%) 197 (20%) 210 (23%)
Fmax CMJ (N) 1726 ± 252 1880 ± 224$ 1414 ± 271 −303 (−18%) 170 (9%) −473 (−25%) 308 (20%) 350 (19%) 327 (20%)
Time to Fmax CMJ (s) 0.72 ± 0.21 0.71 ± 0.19 0.74 ± 0.21 0.01 (3%) −0.01 (0%) 0.02 (4%) 0.16 (23%) 0.09 (13%) 0.14 (19%)
Flight time CMJ (s) 0.53 ± 0.07 0.49 ± 0.10$ 0.53 ± 0.07 0.01 (1%) −0.04 (−6%) 0.04 (8%) 0.03 (6%) 0.10 (20%) 0.10 (17%)
Fmax landing CMJ (N) 4394 ± 1104 3047 ± 473$ 1379 ± 200 −3023 (−69%) −1347 (−31%) −1676 (−55%) 2086 (72%) 2272 (61%) 838 (37%)
Impulse DJ (Ns) 522 ± 111 553 ± 99 392 ± 79 −126 (−25%) 36 (6%) −162 (−29%) 147 (32%) 123 (23%) 122 (26%)
Fmax DJ (N) 4667 ± 1002 3918 ± 678$ 1897 ± 285 −2678 (−59%) −730 (−16%) −1948 (−52%) 1845 (57%) 1414 (34%) 1250 (44%)
Time to Fmax DJ (s) 0.06 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.02$ 0.17 ± 0.03 0.11 (176%) 0.02 (38%) 0.08 (100%) 0.04 (36%) 0.03 (39%) 0.04 (36%)
GCT DJ (s) 0.22 ± 0.05 0.25 ± 0.05 0.22 ± 0.05 −0.01 (−2%) 0.02 (10%) −0.03 (−11%) 0.02 (7%) 0.03 (13%) 0.03 (13%)
Flight time DJ (s) 0.49 ± 0.07 0.47 ± 0.08 0.50 ± 0.07 0.00 (1%) −0–03 (−5%) 0.03 (7%) 0.02 (4%) 0.05 (9%) 0.04 (9%)

CMJ, counter movement jump; Fmax, maximal force; DJ, drop jump; GCT, ground contact time; significantly different to the other two methods; $different to AMTI force plate; different to PedarX.