Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 15;194(12):1532–1540. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0769OC

Table 2.

Diagnostic Benefit of CF Supplementation versus No Rpf Supplementation in Smear-Negative and Smear-Positive Individuals

Variables Smear-Positive Correlation* Smear-Negative Correlation*
CF+ MPN    
 MGIT TTP vs. log CF+ MPN −0.54 (P < 0.0001) −0.54 (P = 0.0049)
 GeneXpert cycle threshold vs. log CF+ MPN −0.62 (P < 0.0001) −0.74 (P = 0.0004)
Rpf MPN    
 MGIT TTP vs. log Rpf MPN −0.53 (P < 0.0001) −0.13§ (P = 0.53)
 GeneXpert cycle threshold vs. log Rpf MPN −0.61 (P < 0.0001) −0.01§ (P = 0.95)

Definition of abbreviations: CF = culture filtrate; MGIT = mycobacteria growth indicator tube; MPN = most probable number; Rpf = resuscitation-promoting factors; TTP = time to positivity.

*

Pearson coefficient.

TTP in days.

Significant negative linear relationship between variable and log CF+ MPN/Rpf MPN.

§

A weak nonsignificant negative linear relationship between variable and log Rpf MPN in smear-negative patients.