Table 4.
Relationship between GlycA and Vascular disease
A: Multivariable regression analyses show a direct relationship between vascular inflammation and GlycA. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Model | Total Cohort | Psoriasis | Control |
Unadjusted | 0.30 (<0.001) | 0.30 (<0.001) | 0.26 (<0.001) |
Adjusted for age and gender | 0.29 (<0.001) | 0.28 (<0.001) | 0.22 (<0.001) |
Adjusted for age, gender and FRS | 0.25 (<0.001) | 0.25 (<0.001) | 0.22 (<0.001) |
Adjusted for age, gender, FRS and BMI | 0.26 (<0.001) | 0.22 (<0.001) | 0.17 (0.045) |
Adjusted for age, gender, FRS, BMI, SBP, LDL-C, HDL-C, HOMA-IR, Smoking and Statins |
0.21 (0.002) | 0.26 (0.004) | 0.18 (0.03) |
B: Multivariable regression analyses show a direct relationship between total burden of coronary artery disease quantified by CCTA and GlycA. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Model | Total Cohort | Psoriasis | Control |
Unadjusted | 0.17 (<0.001) | 0.31 (<0.001) | 0.13 (0.002) |
Adjusted for age and gender | 0.15 (<0.001) | 0.25 (0.005) | 0.12 (0.003) |
Adjusted for age, gender and FRS | 0.16 (0.003) | 0.26 (0.004) | 0.15 (0.007) |
Adjusted for age, gender, FRS and BMI | 0.12 (0.007) | 0.24 (0.002) | 0.10 (0.02) |
Adjusted for age, gender, FRS, BMI, SBP, LDL-C, HDL-C, HOMA-IR, Smoking and Statins |
0.14 (0.001) | 0.34 (0.01) | 0.13 (0.04) |
All values reported as ‘Standardized β (p value)’.
CCTA: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, FRS: Framingham Risk Score, BMI: Body Mass Index, SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure, HOMA-IR: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance.