Table 4.
PEDro scale criteria and scoringa
| Criterion | Study | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Munday 2007 [40] | Haik 2014 [41] | Kardouni 2015 [38] | Kardouni 2015 [39] | |
| Random allocation | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Concealed allocation | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| Baseline comparability | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Subject blinding | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| Therapist blinding | ||||
| Assessor blinding | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Follow-up | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Intention-to-treat | ||||
| Between group analysis | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Point estimates and variability | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Total | 4/10 | 6/10 | 8/10 | 8/10 |
aRanking as follows: 9 to 10 is considered excellent, 6 to 8 is good, 4 to 5 is fair, and 3 or
below represents poor quality