Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 7;31(8):868–878. doi: 10.1002/gps.4401

Table 2.

Within‐group and between‐group differences in GDS and MADRS scores at 4 and 7 months

Adjusted within‐groupa Adjusted between‐groupb
Exercise Control
Test n c Month n d Mean (95% CI) P n d Mean (95% CI) P Mean (95% CI) P ICCe
GDS 183 4 83 0.03 (–0.53, 0.59) 0.91 81 0.08 (–0.49, 0.64) 0.78 –0.05 (–0.84, 0.75) 0.91 0.032
184 7 73 –0.03 (–0.61, 0.56) 0.92 75 0.03 (–0.55, 0.61) 0.91 –0.06 (–0.89, 0.76) 0.88
MADRS 183 4 83 0.40 (–0.77, 1.57) 0.50 80 0.33 (–0.85, 1.52) 0.58 0.06 (–1.60, 1.73) 0.94 <0.001
184 7 73 –0.08 (–1.30, 1.15) 0.90 74 –0.24 (–1.47, 0.99) 0.70 0.16 (–1.57, 1.89) 0.86

Note

GDS, 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intracluster correlation coefficient.

a

Performed using linear mixed models with least square means (follow‐up – baseline values), adjusted for age, sex, antidepressant use, cluster, and test‐subject.

b

Three‐way interactions of activity, time, and subgroup were analyzed in the total sample using linear mixed models adjusting for cluster and test‐subject as random effects and age, sex, and antidepressant use as fixed effects.

c

Number of participants in analyses with baseline or follow‐up outcome measurement.

d

Number of participants in subgroup with complete before‐and‐after measurement.

e

Calculated as the proportion of the total variance attributed to cluster variance in GDS and MADRS scores in the total sample.