Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 9;329(7470):821. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38226.719803.EB

Table 2.

Thromboembolic outcomes in accuracy studies

Potential testing schemes Study, year d-dimer test No of patients (No of venous thromboembolism events) Three month cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism in% (95% CI)
Low clinical probability and a normal d-dimer result



Bucek et al., 200297 STA-LIA 48 (0) 0.0 (0 to 7.4)
Kraaijenhagen et al., 200298 SimpliRED 561 (10) 1.8 (0.9 to 3.2)
Shields et al., 200299 SimpliRED 32 (0) 0.0 (0.0 to 10.1)
Wells et al., 1998100 SimpliRED 206 (1) 0.5 (0.0 to 2.7)
Ginsberg et al., 1997101 SimpliRED 178 (1) 0.6 (0.0 to 3.1)
Anderson et al., 20009 SimpliRED 97 (0) 0.0 (0.0 to 3.7)
Pooled.*
Included patients with history of deep vein thrombosis


1.3 (0.5 to 2.3)
Excluded patients with history of deep vein thrombosis


0.3 (0.01 to 1.1)
Moderate clinical probability and a normal d-dimer result



Shields et al, 200299 SimpliRED 20 (0) 0.0 (0.0 to 16.8)
Wells et al, 1998100 SimpliRED 87 (3) 3.4 (0.7 to 9.8)
Ginsberg et al, 1997101 SimpliRED 97 (3) 3.1 (0.6 to 8.8)
Anderson et al, 20009 SimpliRED 51 (3) 5.9 (1.2 to 16.2)
Pooled
High probability and a normal d-dimer result
Shields et al, 200299 SimpliRED 7 (2) 29 (3.7 to 71.0)
Wells et al, 1998100 SimpliRED 7 (1) 14.3 (0.4 to 57.9)
Ginsberg et al, 1997101 SimpliRED 5 (2) 40.0 (5.3 to 85.3)
Anderson et al, 20009 SimpliRED 15 (2) 13.3 (1.7 to 40.5)
Pooled 21.0 (8.0 to 37.0)
*

P value comparing studies that excluded and included patients with history of deep vein thrombosis was significant, P=0.04.

P value comparing studies that excluded and included patients with history of deep vein thrombosis were not significant (P=0.5 for moderate probability and P=0.3 for high probability).