Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 9;329(7470):828. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38237.585000.7C

Table 4.

Metaregression and subgroup analysis of sources of variability for major outcomes analysed in review (in respect of categorical and continuous study factors) in studies of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors compared with placebo

Mortality
Doubling of serum creatinine concentration
End stage renal disease
Microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria
Microalbuminuria to normoalbuminuria
Variable Relative risk (95% CI): No of trials P value Relative risk (95% CI) P value Relative risk 95% CI); No of trials P value Relative risk (95% CI); No of trials P value Relative risk (95% CI); No of trials P value
Type of diabetes:
1
0.71 (0.33 to 1.52); n=4
0.84* 0.57 (0.38 to 0.88); n=3
0.04* 0.60 (0.36 to 1.01); n=2
0.56* 0.44 (0.27 to 0.70); n=9
0.12* 3.62 (2.24 to 5.83); n=10
<0.001*
2
4.23 (0.69 to 25.83); n=2
0.21 (0.06 to 0.66); n=2
Not estimable
0.20 (0.08 to 0.52); n=3
24.53 (1.49 to 403.6); n=1
Mixed 0.54 (0.12 to 2.36); n=2 1.23 (0.67 to 2.30); n=1 0.88 (0.27 to 2.88); n=1 Not estimable 2.04 (0.41 to 10.11); n=2
Hypertension:
Present
0.80 (0.48 to 1.32); n=6
0.45 0.72 (0.43 to 1.23); n=4
0.22 0.67 (0.41 to 1.08); n=1
0.34 0.84 (0.67 to 1.05); n=4
0.001 2.12 (1.12 to 4.02); n=5
0.01
Absent 1.73 (0.22 to 13.44); n=2 0.32 (0.07 to 1.58); n=2 0.66 (0.41 to 1.07); n=2 0.37 (0.21 to 0.65); n=9 4.99 (2.52 to 9.89); n=7
Stage of nephropathy:









Microalbuminuria
0.79 (0.53 to 1.16); n=4
0.92 0.52 (0.14 to 1.98); n=3
0.88 0.88 (0.27 to 2.88); n=1
0.55 0.47 (0.28 to 0.79); n=12
0.86 3.35 (1.83 to 6.16); n=12
0.80
Macroalbuminuria
1.07 (0.37 to 3.12); n=4
0.56 (0.37 to 0.86); n=3
0.60 (0.36 to 1.01); n=2
0.24 (0.06 to 1.00); n=1
Not estimable
Mixed Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable 0.41 (0.11 to 1.54); n=1 3.94 (1.48 to 10.48); n=1
Allocation concealment:









Adequate
0.78 (0.61 to 1.00); n=1
0.88 1.11 (0.62 to 1.98); n=2
0.03 0.88 (0.27 to 2.88); n=1
0.55 0.83 (0.67 to 1.04); n=5
<0.001 2.71 (1.20 to 1.07); n=5
0.21
Unclear 0.98 (0.41 to 2.33); n=7 0.48 (0.29 to 0.80); n=4 0.60 (0.36 to 1.01); n=2 0.31 (0.18 to 0.52); n=9 3.72 (2.06 to 6.73); n=8
Blinding of participants or investigators:









Yes
1.70 (0.22 to 13.18); n=2
0.46 0.32 (0.66 to 1.58); n=2
0.22 0.16 (0.00 to 2.88); n=1
0.34 0.27 (0.12 to 0.62); n=4
0.06 6.24 (1.96 to 19.85); n=3
0.21
No 0.79 (0.48 to 1.32); n=6 0.72 (0.43 to 1.23); n=4 0.67 (0.41 to 1.08); n=2 0.64 (0.43 to 0.95); n=10 2.73 (1.59 to 4.68); n=10
Intention to treat analysis:









Yes
0.77 (0.61 to 0.97); n=4
0.26 0.80 (0.44 to 1.44); n=3
0.08 0.64 (0.40 to 1.03); n=3
Not estimable 0.83 (0.67 to 1.04); n=4
0.001 2.26 (1.21 to 4.22); n=4
<0.001
No 1.57 (0.27 to 9.07); n=4 0.28 (0.11 to 0.72); n=3 Not estimable 0.36 (0.21 to 0.62); n=10 6.91 (2.89 to 16.48); n=9
Lost to follow up (%):









0
5.0 (0.55 to 45.39; n=1
0.56 0.44 (0.13 to 1.52); n=2
0.98 Not estimable
0.37 0.56 (0.28 to 1.13); n=5
0.05 3.50 (2.06 to 5.95); n=7
0.20
1-10
0.79 (0.62 to 1.01); n=2
0.48 (0.06 to 3.82); n=2
0.88 (0.27 to 2.88); n=1
0.43 (0.18 to 1.03); n=5
1.72 (0.88 to 3.35); n=3
11-20
3.13 (0.13 to 75.49); n=1
Not estimable
Not estimable
0.30 (0.13 to 0.66); n=2
13.30 (1.76 to 100.70); n=2
>20 0.58 (0.27 to 1.23); n=4 0.58 (0.37 to 0.90); n=2 2 0.60 (0.36 to 1.01); n=2 0.28 (0.06 to 1.29); n=2 11.79 (0.75 to 184.66); n=1
Duration of follow up (months):









6-23
2.53 (0.11 to 57.83); n=1
0.95 0.52 (0.10 to 2.69); n=1
0.83 Not estimable
0.63 0.56 (0.21 to 1.48); n=3
0.17 8.63 (1.76 to 42.42); n=3
0.001
24-47
0.92 (0.22 to 3.81); n=4
0.55 (0.36 to 0.86); n=2
0.63 (0.37 to 1.07); n=1
0.54 (0.29 to 1.01); n=6
3.36 (2.04 to 5.53); n=7
≥48 0.79 (0.62 to 1.01); n=3 0.58 (0.16 to 2.14); n=3 0.63 (0.16 to 2.44); n=2 0.31 (0.12 to 0.79); n=5 4.12 (0.56 to 30.28); n=3

Some data are not estimable either because no trial with this variable reported outcome or because trials in this group reported 0 events in both treatment and control arms. P values calculated through random effects metaregression analysis.

*

Calculated by analysing each category compared to first category.

Calculated with random effects metaregression for differences in risk across all trials considering variable on continuous scale, but relative risks and 95% confidence intervals provided for major categories.