Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec 3;39(3):287–294. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9845-z

Table 2.

Comparison of ECWT and HIFU: biomechanical effects and clinical applications

Ultrasound parameters Predominant biomechanical effects Delivery FDA-approved clinical applications Potential cardiovascular applications
ECWT High amplitude, separate pulses Non-thermal (cavitation, streaming) Linear, absorbed by tissue between transducer and target Lithotripsy, plantar fasciitis, epicondylitis Ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease
HIFU High frequency, continuous wave Thermal (heating, liquefactive necrosis) Focused, minimal off-target effects Uterine fibroids, laparoscopic tissue ablation, venous and arterial thromboses AF and VT ablation, ASD/VSD creation, AVN ablation, functional MR, peripheral vascular disease, ischemic heart disease