Table 2. Effect of dietary types on feed and nutrient intakes in Tibetan sheep and yaks (mean±S.E.).
| Items | TMR | OH | OS | TG | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tibetan sheep | ||||||
| DMI (kg/d) | 1.41±0.03a | 1.31±0.03b | 1.22±0.03c | 0.69±0.02d | 0.02 | < 0.001 |
| DMI/kg LW (g/kg) | 43.53±1.13ab | 40.87±0.91b | 43.75±1.36a | 28.00c | 0.67 | < 0.001 |
| DMI/kg LW0.75 (g/kg) | 103.37±2.14a | 97.10±2.13b | 100.29±2.71ab | 62.18±0.44c | 1.55 | < 0.001 |
| CPI (g/d) | 147.84±3.17a | 74.47±1.89c | 102.78±2.32b | 35.18±0.93d | 3.09 | < 0.001 |
| NDFI (g/d) | 467.39±10.03c | 714.88±18.11a | 611.81±13.80b | 404.52±10.70d | 10.86 | 0.001 |
| Yaks | ||||||
| DMI (kg/d) | 5.16±0.11a | 3.77±0.09b | 3.01±0.05c | 2.63±0.05d | 0.08 | < 0.001 |
| DMI/kg LW (g/kg) | 32.83±0.78a | 34.29±0.79a | 29.03±0.59b | 28.00b | 0.36 | < 0.001 |
| DMI/kg LW0.75 (g/kg) | 115.84±2.27a | 110.89±2.40a | 92.61±1.72b | 86.99±0.46c | 1.27 | < 0.001 |
| CPI (g/d) | 532.51±10.85a | 215.06±5.34b | 253.21±3.89c | 134.13±2.78d | 11.10 | < 0.001 |
| NDFI (g/d) | 1714.25±34.93b | 2064.47±50.28a | 1512.01±23.26c | 1542.25±30.06c | 23.87 | < 0.001 |
Values that does not share the same letters are significantly (P < 0.05) different from each other.