Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 5;39(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40902-016-0099-4

Table 3.

Comparing patients with MRONJ between MM stages according to each factor (sign, location, etiologic factor, BP type, treatment, and outcome) of MM

Stage
1 2 3 P value
Number of patients 2 6 1
Location (%) 1
 Mandible 2 (100) 5 (83.33) 1 (100)
 Maxilla 0 (0) 1 (16.67) 0 (0)
Infection (%) 0.0476*
 Yes 0 (0) 5 (83.33) 0 (0)
 No 2 (100) 1 (16.67) 1 (100)
Etiology (%) 0.7222
 Extraction 1 (50) 3 (50) 1 (100)
 Prosthesis problem 0 (0) 2 (33.33) 0 (0)
 Periodontal problem 0 (0) 1 (16.67) 0 (0)
 Spontaneous 1 (50) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Bisphosphonate type (%) 0.25
Combinationa 2 (100) 5 (83.33) 0 (0)
 Only zoledronate 0 (0) 1 (16.67) 0 (0)
 Only pamidronate 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (100)
Treatmentb (%) 0.6429
 Conservative 2 (100) 3 (50) 1 (100)
 Invasive 0 (0) 3 (50) 0 (0)
Outcome (%) 1
 1 1 (100) 4 (80) 0 (0)
 2 0 (0) 1 (20) 0 (0)
Duration in months 21 (17–25) 19 (11–69) 9 (9–9) 0.2992

Categorical variables such as sign, location, etiologic factor, BP type, treatment, and outcome were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables such as duration were analyzed by Wilcoxon test

*Statistically significant (p value <0.05)

aCombination of zoledronate and pamidronate

bConservative: antibiotic therapy and dressing invasive: biopsy or saucerization