Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 1;23(1):64–71. doi: 10.5056/jnm16047

Table 4.

Correlation Between pH-impedance Parameters and High-resolution Manometry Metrics

AET No. of long term acid reflux Recumbent acid reflux Acid reflux episodes Weakly acid reflux episodes Alkaline reflux episodes SI Distal BIL
UESP 0.226 0.123 0.374 0.243 0.207 0.197 −0.472 0.489a
PEP −0.479a −0.502a −0.393 −0.219 −0.285 −0.188 0.280 0.634b
MEP −0.451a −0.455a −0.370 −0.243 −0.422 −0.053 0.024 0.361
DEP −0.366 −0.404 −0.263 −0.165 −0.389 −0.014 0.319 0.140
DCI −0.463a −0.475a −0.397 −0.255 −0.438a −0.123 0.206 0.360
LESL −0.371 −0.579b −0.240 −0.087 −0.13 0.198 0.544 0.395
LESP −0.215 −0.207 −0.240 −0.123 −0.452a −0.158 0.291 0.417a
IRP −0.158 −0.342 −0.282 0.033 −0.612b −0.080 0.28 0.295

AET, acid exposure time; SI, symptom index; BIL, Baseline impedance level; UESP, upper esophageal sphincter basal pressure; PEP, proximal esophageal pressure; MEP, middle esophageal pressure; DEP, distal esophageal pressure; DCI, distal contractile integral; LESL, lower esophageal sphincter length; LESP, lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure; IRP, integrated relaxation pressure.

Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r.

P-values were calculated using Pearson’s correlation analysis.

a

P < 0.05 and

b

P < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.