Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 16;155(1):124–134. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw181

TABLE 3.

Influence of N6AMT1 and As3MT genotypes on fractions of arsenic metabolites and methylation capacity indexes.

Gene SNPs Genotypea N % iAs % MMA % DMA PMI SMI
N6AMT1 rs1006903 GG 170 7.69 (0.53)b 26.32 (0.94) 66.00 (1.04) 0.92 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
GC 105 7.52 (0.68) 25.06 (1.20) 67.42 (1.33) 0.93 (0.01) 0.73 (0.01)
CC 14 8.66 (1.87) 30.88 (3.28) 60.47 (3.64) 0.91 (0.02) 0.66 (0.04)
P-value .848 .234 .189 .848 .158
rs1003671 AA 130 8.96 (0.60)*c 26.32 (1.06) 64.72 (1.17)* 0.91 (0.01)* 0.71 (0.01)
GA 130 6.20 (0.60)* 24.59 (1.07)* 69.21 (1.17)*† 0.94 (0.01)* 0.74 (0.01)*
GG 29 8.49 (1.27) 31.69 (2.26)* 59.82 (2.48) 0.92 (0.01) 0.65 (0.03)*
P-value .005 .018 .001 .005 .007
rs4816333 CC 107 7.32 (0.67) 26.76 (1.19) 65.92 (1.31) 0.93 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
CG 132 7.15 (0.60) 25.53 (1.07) 67.33 (1.19) 0.93 (0.01) 0.72 (0.01)
GG 50 9.81 (0.98) 26.08 (1.74) 64.11 (1.93) 0.90 (0.01) 0.71 (0.02)
P-value .055 .744 .349 .055 .677
rs7282280 CC 174 7.94 (0.53) 26.21 (0.93) 65.86 (1.03) 0.92 (0.01) 0.72 (0.01)
CT 101 7.17 (0.70) 25.59 (1.23) 67.25 (1.37) 0.93 (0.01) 0.72 (0.01)
TT 14 8.03 (1.88) 28.11 (3.32) 63.87 (3.68) 0.92 (0.02) 0.69 (0.04)
P-value .668 .762 .584 .668 .733
rs7282257 TT 68 9.62 (0.84)* 24.69 (1.49) 65.69 (1.66) 0.90 (0.01)* 0.73 (0.02)
TA 143 7.26 (0.57) 26.66 (1.03) 66.07 (1.14) 0.93 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
AA 78 6.73 (0.78)* 26.23 (1.39) 67.04 (1.55) 0.93 (0.01)* 0.72 (0.02)
P-value .026 .548 .820 .026 .716
rs2065266 CC 144 8.85 (0.57)* 25.75 (1.02) 65.40 (1.13) 0.91 (0.01)* 0.72 (0.01)
CT 120 6.16 (0.62)* 26.09 (1.12) 67.76 (1.24) 0.94 (0.01)* 0.72 (0.01)
TT 25 8.20 (1.38) 27.94 (2.47) 63.86 (2.74) 0.92 (0.01) 0.70 (0.03)
P-value .006 .716 .250 .006 .692
rs2738966 GG 67 9.49 (0.84)* 24.43 (1.50) 66.08 (1.67) 0.91 (0.01)* 0.73 (0.02)
GA 147 7.44 (0.57) 27.16 (1.01) 65.40 (1.12) 0.93 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
AA 75 6.52 (0.80)* 25.43 (1.42) 68.05 (1.58) 0.94 (0.01)* 0.73 (0.02)
P-value .033 .280 .391 .033 .316
rs2248501 GG 75 6.52 (0.80)* 25.43 (1.42) 68.05 (1.58) 0.94 (0.01)* 0.73 (0.02)
GT 147 7.44 (0.57) 27.16 (1.01) 65.40 (1.12) 0.93 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
TT 67 9.49 (0.84)* 24.43 (1.50) 66.08 (1.67) 0.91 (0.01)* 0.73 (0.02)
P-value .033 .280 .391 .033 .316
As3MT rs7085104 AA 80 8.09 (0.78) 24.86 (1.38) 67.04 (1.54) 0.92 (0.01) 0.73 (0.02)
AG 142 6.96 (0.58) 27.68 (1.03) 65.36 (1.15) 0.93 (0.01) 0.70 (0.01)
GG 67 8.69 (0.87) 24.14 (1.53) 67.18 (1.71) 0.91 (0.01) 0.73 (0.02)
P-value .208 .091 .559 .208 .184
rs3740400 CC 84 7.75 (0.78) 24.96 (1.36) 67.30 (1.51) 0.92 (0.01) 0.73 (0.02)
CA 146 7.44 (0.58) 27.83 (1.01) 64.73 (1.12) 0.93 (0.01) 0.70 (0.01)
AA 56 8.28 (0.94) 23.50 (1.64) 68.23 (1.82) 0.92 (0.01) 0.74 (0.02)
P-value .746 .046 .175 .746 .064
rs3740393 CC 15 7.97 (1.79) 24.82 (3.19) 67.21 (3.52) 0.92 (0.02) 0.73 (0.04)
CG 117 6.68 (0.64) 25.05 (1.14) 68.28 (1.26) 0.93 (0.01) 0.73 (0.01)
GG 157 8.39 (0.55) 26.97 (0.98) 64.64 (1.09) 0.92 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
P-value .132 .414 .092 .132 .286
rs3740390 GG 158 8.41 (0.55) 26.93 (0.98) 64.67 (1.08) 0.92 (0.01) 0.71 (0.01)
GA 116 6.64 (0.64) 25.09 (1.14) 68.28 (1.26) 0.93 (0.01) 0.73 (0.01)
AA 15 7.97 (1.79) 24.83 (3.19) 67.21 (3.52) 0.92 (0.02) 0.73 (0.04)
P-value .116 .441 .095 .116 .305
rs1046778 TT 83 8.70 (0.76) 26.57 (1.36) 64.74 (1.50) 0.91 (0.01) 0.71 (0.02)
TC 158 7.44 (0.55) 25.92 (0.98) 66.64 (1.08) 0.93 (0.01) 0.72 (0.01)
CC 48 6.67 (1.00) 25.78 (1.78) 67.55 (1.98) 0.93 (0.01) 0.72 (0.02)
P-value .230 .913 .458 .230 .806
a

The genotype of ancestral allele homozygote in each SNP was denoted first.

b

Mean (Standard Error). ANCOVA were used to adjust for potential confounding variablesat the following values: Gender = 1.4014, Age = 50.529, BMI = 24.616, Smoker = 0.3668, Drinker = 0.3080.

c

Comparison was done among any 2 groups, and those marked with same symbols (*,†) were significantly different (P < .05).