Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;7:2007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02007

Table 1.

Sample characteristics, ITT-means, (SDs) and effect strengths (Cohen’s d) of pre to post changes of dental fear measures within the LG-OST-condition.

LG-OST (n = 43)

Pre Post Pre > Post

M (SD) M (SD) statistics ESa [95% CI]
Sample characteristics and clinical data
Sex (f/m) 34/9
Age (years) 50.56 (11.30)
STAI-S 46.78 (11.67) 43.16 (12.77) F(1,42) = 6.17, η2 = 0.13 0.30 [(-0.13)–(0.72)]
STAI-T 43.83 (11.44)
DASS 19.98 (12.32)
Dental fear measures
DAS 16.95 (2.49) 14.44 (3.40) F(1,42) = 44.37∗∗∗, η2 = 0.51 0.84 [0.40–1.29]
HAF 43.75 (6.87) 40.00 (7.75) F(1,42) = 20.94∗∗∗, η2 = 0.33 0.51 [0.08–0.94]
DCQ 21.00 (5.92) 15.96 (6.33) F(1,34) = 29.41∗∗∗, η2 = 0.47 0.82 [0.37–1.26]
IDCI-R p 7.95 (3.06) 9.02 (3.10) F(1,42) = 6.65, η2 = 0.14 -0.35 [(0.08)–(-0.77)]
IDCI-R d 21.91 (3.69) 21.51 (3.69) F(1,42) = 2.51, n.s.
BAT 6.19 (1.45) 6.35 (1.48) F(1,42) = 1.60, n.s.
GSR 4.92 (0.88)

DAS = Dental Anxiety Scale; DCQ = Dental Cognition Questionnaire; IDCI-R p = Revised Iowa Dental Control Index, predicted control; IDCI-R d = Revised Iowa Dental Control Index, desired control; GSR = Global Success Rating. aEffect sizes not reported when pre- to post-changes were not significant. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure