Table 2.
Factors | Model | χ2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | WRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | unitary | 2672.858* | 209 | 0.931 | 0.924 | 0.026 | 3.751 |
2 | correlated | 2537.522* | 208 | 0.935 | 0.928 | 0.025 | 3.646 |
uncorrelated | 14778.662* | 209 | 0.592 | 0.549 | 0.063 | 10.530 | |
bifactor orthogonal | 790.076* | 187 | 0.983 | 0.979 | 0.014 | 1.785 | |
bifactor oblique | 535.156* | 186 | 0.990 | 0.988 | 0.010 | 1.345 | |
3 | correlated | 2538.428* | 206 | 0.935 | 0.927 | 0.026 | 3.644 |
uncorrelated | 16091.871* | 209 | 0.556 | 0.509 | 0.066 | 11.284 | |
bifactor orthogonal | 796.691* | 187 | 0.983 | 0.979 | 0.014 | 1.825 | |
bifactor oblique | 520.216* | 184 | 0.991 | 0.988 | 0.010 | 1.326 | |
second-order | 2538.431* | 206 | 0.935 | 0.927 | 0.026 | 3.644 | |
4 | correlated | 2175.656* | 203 | 0.945 | 0.937 | 0.024 | 3.285 |
uncorrelated | 17243.569* | 209 | 0.523 | 0.473 | 0.069 | 12.116 | |
bifactor orthogonal | 688.078* | 187 | 0.986 | 0.983 | 0.012 | 1.697 | |
bifactor oblique | 358.122* | 181 | 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.008 | 1.053 | |
second-order | 2142.621* | 205 | 0.946 | 0.939 | 0.023 | 3.294 | |
5 | correlated | 1715.270* | 199 | 0.958 | 0.951 | 0.021 | 2.868 |
uncorrelated | 23397.312* | 209 | 0.351 | 0.283 | 0.080 | 14.479 | |
bifactor orthogonal | 1847.421* | 187 | 0.954 | 0.943 | 0.023 | 2.996 | |
bifactor oblique | 342.373* | 177 | 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.007 | 1.024 | |
second-order | 2018.649* | 204 | 0.949 | 0.942 | 0.023 | 3.194 |
Note: N = 17 327. CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; χ2, Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Statistic; df, degrees of freedom; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; TLI, Tucker Lewis Index; RMSEA, Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation; WRMR, Weighted Root Mean Square Residual. Bifactor orthogonal = correlations between specific factors fixed to zero. Bifactor oblique = correlations between specific factors freely estimated.
*Statistical significance (P < .01).