Table 1. Antitumor effects of roneparstat and irinotecan against human A204 rhabdoid sarcoma xenografts.
Drug | Na | Doseb (mg/kg/day) | Schedule | TVI%c (day) | CRd | NEDe |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
irinotecan | 8 | 50 | q4dx4 | 95 (24)**,## | 1/8 | 0/8 |
roneparstat | 7 | 60×2 | 2qdx6/wx4w | 80 (24)**,# | 0/7 | 0/7 |
roneparstat plus irinotecan | 8 | 60×2 50 | 2qdx6/wx4w q4dx4 | 100 (24)** | 8/8 | 5/8 |
N, number of treated mice
Tumor fragments were implanted s.c. in the right flank of nude mice at day 0 and treatments started the day after. Roneparstat, dissolved in sterile saline, was administered s.c. at 10 ml/kg; irinotecan, dissolved in sterile distilled water, was delivered i.v. at 15 ml/kg. Drugs were administered, as indicated, alone or in combination.
TVI%, tumor volume inhibition percent = 100 − (mean tumor volume of treated mice / mean tumor volume of control mice × 100) determined on day 24 after tumor implantation.
CR, complete regressions, i.e. disappearance of the tumors lasting at least ten days after the end of treatments
NED, mice with no evidence of disease at the end of the experiment (day 115).
P < 0.001 vs control tumors
P < 0.05
P < 0.01 vs combination-treated tumors, by Student's t test.