Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 25;7(30):47848–47863. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10292

Table 1. Antitumor effects of roneparstat and irinotecan against human A204 rhabdoid sarcoma xenografts.

Drug Na Doseb (mg/kg/day) Schedule TVI%c (day) CRd NEDe
irinotecan 8 50 q4dx4 95 (24)**,## 1/8 0/8
roneparstat 7 60×2 2qdx6/wx4w 80 (24)**,# 0/7 0/7
roneparstat plus irinotecan 8 60×2 50 2qdx6/wx4w q4dx4 100 (24)** 8/8 5/8
a

N, number of treated mice

b

Tumor fragments were implanted s.c. in the right flank of nude mice at day 0 and treatments started the day after. Roneparstat, dissolved in sterile saline, was administered s.c. at 10 ml/kg; irinotecan, dissolved in sterile distilled water, was delivered i.v. at 15 ml/kg. Drugs were administered, as indicated, alone or in combination.

c

TVI%, tumor volume inhibition percent = 100 − (mean tumor volume of treated mice / mean tumor volume of control mice × 100) determined on day 24 after tumor implantation.

d

CR, complete regressions, i.e. disappearance of the tumors lasting at least ten days after the end of treatments

e

NED, mice with no evidence of disease at the end of the experiment (day 115).

**

P < 0.001 vs control tumors

#

P < 0.05

##

P < 0.01 vs combination-treated tumors, by Student's t test.