Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;27(1):89–110. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22675

Table 6.

Mean Firing Frequencies of GCs in Response to the Various Input Patterns Used in Figs. 3–8

Population–distance experiments (pruning, growth, MC loss)
Mean firing rate ± SEM (Hz)
GC models Pruning Growth MC loss
12‐dendrite 3.50 ± 0.002 3.50 ± 0.002 4.82 ± 0.002
6‐dendrite 3.65 ± 0.009 3.85 ± 0.007
3‐dendrite 3.90 ± 0.006 6.35 ± 0.005
Population–distance experiments (Match R in)
Mean firing rate ± SEM (Hz)
Pruning Growth
GC models
gleak
Soma dimensions
gleak
Soma dimensions
6‐dendrite 3.61 ± 0.009 3.58 ± 0.009 3.66 ± 0.008 3.60 ± 0.008
3‐dendrite 3.75 ± 0.007 3.58 ± 0.007 4.59 ± 0.006 3.78 ± 0.006
Population–distance experiments (Match sparsity)
Mean firing rate ± SEM (Hz)
GC models
gleak
Soma dimensions Synaptic weight
6‐dendrite 3.47 ± 0.010 3.44 ± 0.010 3.31 ± 0.010
3‐dendrite 3.47 ± 0.010 3.31 ± 0.010 3.12 ± 0.008
Rate–distance experiments (Control, Growth, MC loss)
Mean firing rate ± SEM (Hz)
Control Growth MC loss
GC models Low input rate (40 Hz) High input rate (50 Hz) Low input rate (40 Hz) High input rate (50 Hz) Low input rate (40 Hz) High input rate (50 Hz)
12‐dendrite 3.75 ± 0.036 5.24 ± 0.048 3.75 ± 0.036 5.24 ± 0.048 4.94 ± 0.057 8.07 ± 0.110
6‐dendrite 3.98 ± 0.028 5.20 ± 0.035 3.83 ± 0.023 5.03 ± 0.030
3‐dendrite 4.13 ± 0.019 5.48 ± 0.023 6.43 ± 0.015 9.07 ± 0.017