. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 6.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;Suppl 35:131–158. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.10182

TABLE 3.

FA comparisons for limb segments in Macaca mulatta

	Humerus	Radius	Third metacarpal	Element	df
Humerus		1.203	1.605	Humerus	195
Radius	P = 0.096		1.335	Radius	211
Third metacarpal	P < 0.001	P < 0.05		Third metacarpal	206

	Femur	Tibia	Third metatarsal	Element	df

Femur		1.002	2.014	Femur	215
Tibia	P = 0.495		2.011	Tibia	213
Third metatarsal	P < 0.001	P < 0.001		Third metatarsal	211

Separate matrices are provided for forelimb and hindlimb. Within each matrix, F-ratios are above diagonal, and P-values are provided below. Significant P values are in bold. Degrees of freedom for F-tests were calculated as df_FA10 = (MS_m − MS_m)²/{(MS_sj)²/[(S − 1)(J − 1)] + (MS_m)²/[SJ(M − 1)]} (Palmer, 1994), where S is number of sides, J is number of individuals (genotypes), and M is number of replicate measurements.