Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 2;34(4):343–351. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248632

Table 2.

Descriptive characteristics across the resulting groups of work ability: type of the most disabling diagnosis (according to ICD10, one for each participant) and the types and numbers of plans made to support return to work (RTW).

Work ability after multidimensional assessment
Good work ability Good work ability expected after RTW support Able to work in thetransitional labour market only Unable to work
n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%)
Category (by ICD10) of the single most disabling diagnosis for each participant
Musculoskeletal or trauma (M, S) 34 (28.1) 19 (40.4) 8 (29.6) 10 (28.6)
Psychiatric (F) 12 (9.9) 15 (31.9) 8 (29.6) 13 (37.1)
Endocrinological or respiratory (I, J) 14 (11.6) 6 (12.8) 2 (7.4) 6 (17.1)
Other 27 (22.3) 7 (14.9) 9 (33.3) 6 (17.1)
No diagnosis 34 (28.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Total 121 (100) 47 (100) 27 (100) 35 (100)
Plansa made to support return to work (RTW)
Medical treatment 12 (10.1) 10 (17.5) 4 (12.5) 12 (34.3)
Physical rehabilitation 4 (3.4) 5 (8.8) 3 (9.4) 2 (5.7)
Psychotherapy 1 (0.8) 3 (5.3) 1 (3.1) 4 (11.4)
Treatment for drug abuse 1 (0.8) 0 (0) 3 (9.4) 1 (2.9)
Vocational instruction or rehabilitation 36 (30.3) 37 (64.9) 14 (43.8) 0 (0)
Studies in Finnish language 4 (3.4) 2 (3.5) 2 (6.3) 0 (0)
No plans needed 66 (51.3) 0 (0) 5 (15.6) 16 (45.7)
Total 124 (100) 57 (100) 32 (100) 35 (100)
a

0–3 plans made (mean 0.7) per participant.