Table 2.
Work ability after multidimensional assessment |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Good work ability | Good work ability expected after RTW support | Able to work in thetransitional labour market only | Unable to work | |
n(%) | n(%) | n(%) | n(%) | |
Category (by ICD10) of the single most disabling diagnosis for each participant | ||||
Musculoskeletal or trauma (M, S) | 34 (28.1) | 19 (40.4) | 8 (29.6) | 10 (28.6) |
Psychiatric (F) | 12 (9.9) | 15 (31.9) | 8 (29.6) | 13 (37.1) |
Endocrinological or respiratory (I, J) | 14 (11.6) | 6 (12.8) | 2 (7.4) | 6 (17.1) |
Other | 27 (22.3) | 7 (14.9) | 9 (33.3) | 6 (17.1) |
No diagnosis | 34 (28.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Total | 121 (100) | 47 (100) | 27 (100) | 35 (100) |
Plansa made to support return to work (RTW) | ||||
Medical treatment | 12 (10.1) | 10 (17.5) | 4 (12.5) | 12 (34.3) |
Physical rehabilitation | 4 (3.4) | 5 (8.8) | 3 (9.4) | 2 (5.7) |
Psychotherapy | 1 (0.8) | 3 (5.3) | 1 (3.1) | 4 (11.4) |
Treatment for drug abuse | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (9.4) | 1 (2.9) |
Vocational instruction or rehabilitation | 36 (30.3) | 37 (64.9) | 14 (43.8) | 0 (0) |
Studies in Finnish language | 4 (3.4) | 2 (3.5) | 2 (6.3) | 0 (0) |
No plans needed | 66 (51.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (15.6) | 16 (45.7) |
Total | 124 (100) | 57 (100) | 32 (100) | 35 (100) |
0–3 plans made (mean 0.7) per participant.