Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 29;6:13–25. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S73268

Table 7.

Comparison in cost-effectiveness of direct medical cost between maintenance with pemetrexed vs. observation alone after induction chemotherapy: study designs and results

Reference Methods, costs and outcomes discount, study perspective, time frame and reference year for cost Data sources Study population Regime Cost LYG or OS QALY ICERa/LYG ICERa/QALY
Greenhalgh et al19 (UK) ERG report reviewing the manufacturer’s evidence submission, de novo economic model
Cost discount ND
Time frame; lifetime
Reference year; ND
Clinical parameters: RCT (JMEN trial) Subgroup of 481 patients in JMEN trial PEM maintenance 15.5 M
 Submitted base caseb £17,455 0.9697 ND £33,732
 Combined effect of changes £20,925 0.9539 ND £47,239
BSC alone 10.3 M
 Submitted base caseb £8,318 0.6988
 Combined effect of changes £8,370 0.6881
Klein et al20 (US) Semi-Markov model
Discounted at 3%
US payer’s perspective
Time frame; 3 years
Reference; 2009 US$
Clinical parameters: RCT (JMEN, ATLAS, SATURN trials)
Cost: Medicare reimbursement rate and analysis of claim database (PharMetrics)
Advanced NSCLC patients who have completed first-line platinum double chemotherapy without progression PEM maintenance
 Non-SQ $96,774 1.3412 Y $122,371
 All NSCLC $89,289 1.2434 Y $205,597
BSC alone ND ND
 Non-SQ $64,830 1.0802 Y
 All NSCLC $61,036 1.1060 Y
Tsuchiya et al22 (Japan) Markov model
Discounted at 3% annually
Japanese healthcare payer perspective
Time frame; ND
Reference; 2009 US$ (assumed US $1 to JPY 115)
Clinical parameters: RCT (JMEN trial) Advanced NSCLC (either non-SQ or all histology), Japanese men in their 60s, height 164.6 cm, weight 64.5 kg, BSA 1.70 m2 PEM maintenance
 Non-SQ $68,536 489.4 D 0.7321 $80,563 $150,115
 All NSCLC $64,409 451.8 D 0.6770 $109,024 $203,022
BSC alone
 Non-SQ $39,872 359.5 D 0.5411
 All NSCLC $38,843 366.2 D 0.5511
Matter-Walstra et al21 (Switzerland) Markov model
No discount
Swiss health care system perspective
Time frame; lifetime
Reference; 2010 Swiss prices (€0.72 / Swiss franc)
Clinical parameters: RCT (JMEN trial) Cost: literature Advanced non-SQ
NSCLC, BSA 1.77 m2
PEM maintenance €99,705 15.6 M 0.82 ND €106,202
BSC alone €71,316 10.7 M 0.56
Zeng et al23 (People’ Republic of China) Markov model
Discounted at 3% annually
Chinese health care system perspective
Time frame; 1,2,5 and 10 year
Reference; 2010 US$ (assumed 1 US$ to 6.6515 Chinese yuan)
Clinical parameters: RCT (PARAMOUNT trial)
Cost: BSC and AE costs from literature, market share and local charges in the People’s Republic of China
Advanced non-SQ
NSCLC, weight 65 kg, BSA 1.72 m2
PEM maintenance
 1-year $36,443 0.760 Y 0.440 $193,796 $183,589
 2-year $55,532 1.140 Y 0.631 $99,183 $126,353
 5-year $72,103 1.444 Y 0.776 $80,792 $124,766
 10-year $73,955 1.477 Y 0.791 $79,134 $124,793
BSC alone
 1-year $28,255 0.718 Y 0.396
 2-year $44,181 1.026 Y 0.541
 5-year $54,790 1.230 Y 0.637
 10-year $55,607 1.245 Y 0.644

Notes:

a

Incremental pemetrexed maintenance to BSC;

b

data based upon the evidence submission from the manufacturer (Eli Lilly) to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal process.

Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; BSA, body surface area; BSC, best supportive care; D, days; ERG, evidence review group; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; JPY, Japanese Yen; LYG, life-year gained; M, months; ND, not described; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PEM, pemetrexed; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SQ, squamous cell carcinoma; Y, years.