Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 29;6:13–25. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S73268

Table 8.

Comparison in cost-effectiveness of direct medical cost between pemetrexed and other maintenance therapy: study designs and results

Reference Methods, costs and outcomes discount, study perspective, time frame and reference year for cost Data sources Study population Regime Costs LYG / OS QALY ICER / LYG ICER / QALY
Klein et al20
(US)
See Klein et al20 PEM
 Non-SQ $96,774 1.3412 Y ND
 All NSCLC $89,289 1.2434 Y ND
Erlotinib
Incremental PEM to Erlotinib
 Non-SQ $72,300 1.1784 Y ND $ 150,260 ND
 All NSCLC $71,147 1.1854 Y ND $ 312,341 ND
Bev (15 mg/kg)
Incremental Bev to PEM
 Non-SQ $105,961 1.2933 Y ND Dominated ND
Dickson et al27
(UK)
ERG report reviewing the manufacturer’s evidence submission, de novo economic model
Cost discount; ND
Time frame; lifetime
Reference year; ND
Clinical parameters: RCT (SATURN, JMEN trial) Model 1; SD, All
NSCLC: Erl vs. placebo
Model 2; SD, SQ: Erl vs. placebo
Model 3; SD, non-SQ: Erl vs. PEM
PEM
 SD, non-SQ £26,608 1.5495 Y 0.9229 ND ND
Erlotinib
Incremental PEM to Erlotinib
SD, non-SQ £18,148 1.4213 Y 0.8222 ND £84,029
Nuijten et al28
(France, Germany, Italy and Spain)
Cross-market cost comparison
Perspective of national health-care decision-makers or purchasers.
Time frame; monthly
Reference; 2008 Euro
Clinical parameters: RCT (SATURN, JMEN trial)
Cost; literatures, National drug tariffs for France, Germany, Italy and Spain
Advanced NSCLC PEM ND ND ND ND
 France €3,453
 Germany €5,534
 Italy €2,921
 Spain €3,164
Erlotinib ND ND ND ND
 France €2,140
 Germany €2,732
 Italy €1,518
 Spain €2,048

Abbreviations: Bev, bevacizumab; Erl, erlotinib; ERG, Evidence Review Group; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LYG, life-year gained; ND, not described; NSCLC, non-small-ell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PEM, pemetrexed; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; RCT; randomized controlled trial; SD, stable disease; SQ, squamous cell carcinoma; Y, years.